2011
DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/ssp.172-174.432
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Precipitation Process in a Cu-Ni-Be Alloy

Abstract: Abstract. The precipitation process in an aged Cu-1.9wt%Ni-0.3wt%Be alloy has been examined by high-resolution transmission electron microscopy. The precipitation sequence found is: GunierPreston (G.P.) zones → γ'' → γ' → stable γ. The disk-shaped G.P. zones and the disk-shaped γ'', γ' and γ precipitated phases are composed of monolayers of Be atoms on {100} α of the Cu matrix and alternative Be and Ni matrix layers parallel to {100} α . The γ'' phases consisting of two to eight Be-layers has a body-centered t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The thickening of plate-shaped precipitates and grain-boundary allotriomorphs in several alloy systems, for example, the thickening of Cr-rich precipitates with a lath morphology in a Ni-Cr alloy [18] and plate-shaped γ-precipitates in a Cu−Ni−Be alloy [19], have been reported to occur with parabolic growth kinetics [10]. In contrast, in the case of interface-controlled growth of a precipitate, the interface velocity v I may be written as [16]: (4) where d is the interface width, ν is the vibrational attempt frequency, ∆G m is the difference in free energies per mol between the β-and ω-phases, ∆G d is the activation energy for interface transport, and R and T have their usual meanings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The thickening of plate-shaped precipitates and grain-boundary allotriomorphs in several alloy systems, for example, the thickening of Cr-rich precipitates with a lath morphology in a Ni-Cr alloy [18] and plate-shaped γ-precipitates in a Cu−Ni−Be alloy [19], have been reported to occur with parabolic growth kinetics [10]. In contrast, in the case of interface-controlled growth of a precipitate, the interface velocity v I may be written as [16]: (4) where d is the interface width, ν is the vibrational attempt frequency, ∆G m is the difference in free energies per mol between the β-and ω-phases, ∆G d is the activation energy for interface transport, and R and T have their usual meanings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By space migration, the solute atoms first moved to the α-Cu matrix’s <100> soft elastic direction and forms a single disc shape G.P. zones structure [ 11 , 13 , 19 ], which kept a completely coherent relationship with α-Cu and produced an elastic coherency strain field, with the strength of the alloy increasing rapidly with it. The conductivity increases rate was smaller than the hardness growth rate.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ni atoms occupied the position of the body heart, the Be atoms were in the eight vertices, and unit cell structure was, as shown in Figure 7 f, a metastable γ″, γ′ phase with a BCT structure, with a lattice constant: a = b < c. In the Figure 6 a HRTEM diagram, the measurement location d (010) p = 0.259 nm, d (001) p = 0.368 nm, and the inter-planar distance of the γ″ phase (001) crystal plane’s two layers of Be atoms and the α-Cu matrix’s inter-planar distance were consistent. However, in the corresponding FFT reciprocal lattice diagram, (002) p and (002) α diffraction point locations were not coincident, which means that d (001) p < 0.368 nm, and the actual measured value was between 0.27 nm to 0.32 nm, Ken’ichi et al [ 21 ] measured the lattice constant of the γ″ phase of the Cu-Ni-Be alloy to be a = b = 0.253 nm, c = 0.29 nm and Watanabe et al [ 13 ] measured the lattice constant of the γ″ phase of the Cu-Ni-Be alloy to be a = b = 0.24 nm, c = 0.28 nm. Two layers of the structure of the γ″ phase were imaged by TEM, showing that its diffraction intensity was weak and vulnerable to interference by the α-Cu matrix’s diffraction wave, as shown in Figure 5 d. The 1/2 {220} α position did not show obvious γ″ phase diffraction spots, while these appeared in the Figure 6 b FFT reciprocal lattice.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations