Precipitation manipulation and terrestrial carbon cycling: The roles of treatment magnitude, experimental duration and local climate

Abstract

Aim Precipitation manipulation experiments have shown diverse terrestrial carbon (C) cycling responses when the ecosystem is subjected to different magnitudes of altered precipitation, various experimental durations or heterogeneity in local climate. However, how these factors combine to affect C cycle responses to changes in precipitation remains unclear. Location Global. Time period 1990–2019. Major taxa studied Terrestrial ecosystems. Methods Using observations from 230 published studies in which precipitation was manipulated and terrestrial C cycling variables were measured, we conducted a global meta‐analysis to investigate responses of diverse C cycle processes to altered precipitation, including gross ecosystem productivity, ecosystem respiration, net ecosystem productivity, ecosystem carbon use efficiency, net primary productivity (NPP), aboveground and belowground NPP, aboveground and belowground biomass, shoot‐to‐root ratio, soil respiration and soil microbial biomass C. Results We found that C cycling responses were correlated linearly and positively with the magnitude of precipitation treatments. We also detected that the responses of NPP and its aboveground component (ANPP) to altered precipitation weakened with experimental duration. Furthermore, gross ecosystem productivity, ecosystem respiration and net ecosystem productivity showed larger responses to precipitation treatments of greater magnitude over shorter time periods. The response of soil respiration, a key component of the C budget in most terrestrial ecosystems, depended in particular on the local climate. Local temperature and precipitation not only influenced the magnitude of the response of soil respiration to altered precipitation but also affected its sensitivity to the magnitude of the precipitation treatments, with higher sensitivities in the response of soil respiration to treatment magnitude at drier and colder sites. Main conclusions Our findings highlight the importance of the interactions between the magnitude of precipitation treatments, their duration and the local climate in the response of ecosystem C cycling to altered precipitation, which is crucial to a better understanding of ecosystem C processes and functioning and projecting them under changing precipitation regimes.

Contrasting Responses of Vegetation Production to Rainfall Anomalies Across the Northeast China Transect

“…The mechanism explaining the asymmetric responses to the rainfall anomalies resulted from the non‐linear responses of GPP to rainfall. Linear relationships between GPP and rainfall were reported by some in‐situ observations (Felton et al., 2019; Post & Knapp, 2020; Wang et al., 2021). Based on 20 years of remote sensing observations across the NECT region, we showed that GPP presented a saturating response to rainfall anomalies in semi‐arid regions, where negative effects of dry anomalies on GPP are larger than the positive effects of wet anomalies, that is, negative asymmetry.…”

A distinct sensitivity to the priming effect between labile and stable soil organic carbon

“…If the 95% CI of log e RR did not cover zero, the difference for a variable between labile and more stable SOM was considered significant at α = 0.05. The Shapiro–Wilk test was used to test the normality of the variance of all data, and the fitted coefficients were bootstrapped by 1000 iterations when the normality assumption was violated, using the boot package (Wang et al ., 2021). A linear mixed‐effects model with ‘study’ as a random factor was applied to evaluate the relationships of the log e RR of PE with soil physicochemical properties.…”

Multi‐year drought alters plant species composition more than productivity across northern temperate grasslands

“…Another overlooked attribute of drought is the effect of duration, and those that have assessed drought duration report conflicting patterns (Estiarte et al, 2016;Gao et al, 2019;Komatsu et al, 2019). Evidence exists that, over time, drought effects can either increase (Felton et al, 2021;Orth et al, 2020), decrease (Wang et al, 2021) or remain unchanged through time (Carroll et al, 2021;Jentsch et al, 2011). The occurrence of a multi-year drought is expected to increase dramatically over this century across North America (Zhao et al, 2020); thus, it is important to ascertain the ecological consequences of prolonged droughts.…”