2019
DOI: 10.1111/1752-1688.12809
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Precipitation as the Primary Driver of Variability in River Nitrogen Loads in the Midwest United States

Abstract: Research Impact Statement: Recent increases in river N-loads in the Midwest United States are primarily caused by wet climate. Under current cropping systems, tile-water remediation will be necessary to reduce river N-loads.ABSTRACT: Nitrogen (N) losses from agricultural lands in the Midwest United States are contributing to the expansion of the hypoxic zone in the Gulf of Mexico. This study evaluated the importance of inter-annual variability in precipitation, land cover, and N fertilizer use on NO 3 + NO 2 -… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results underscore the importance of such noncontrollable factors as weather in determining nitrate‐N losses from cropped fields. Baeumler and Gupta (2020) also concluded that precipitation variations were the main driver for variations in river N loads in the U.S. Midwest.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results underscore the importance of such noncontrollable factors as weather in determining nitrate‐N losses from cropped fields. Baeumler and Gupta (2020) also concluded that precipitation variations were the main driver for variations in river N loads in the U.S. Midwest.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The effects of year‐to‐year variations in precipitation on drainage and nitrate loads have been discussed for decades (e.g., Randall & Goss, 2001; Randall & Mulla, 2001). Recently, however, there is greater attention being paid to long‐term increases in precipitation amounts and variability and the contribution of these trends to increased drain flows and nitrate losses from drained agricultural lands (Baeumler & Gupta, 2020; Nangia et al., 2010b). These climate changes give even more impetus to develop integrated management systems that are resilient under varying conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The observed annual precipitation, averaged across locations, was used to classify years into three “precipitation level” quantiles: “dry” years (161–428 mm), “moderate” years (428–580 mm), and “wet” years (580–1380 mm). Note, this classification is not intended as a formal envirotyping of water deficit scenarios (Chenu et al, 2013) but to reflect the type of informal classification used by growers and agronomic practitioners in the region (Baeumler and Gupta, 2020). The effects of planting date and the interaction of planting date and precipitation levels on all variables were tested using analysis of variance (ANOVA), considering planting date, precipitation level, and hybrid type as fixed factors, and location and year as random factors.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nitrogen, in particular, has been the focus of numerous research with different agendas. In particular, in the area of excess nutrients, limiting nutrient [7], sources of excess nitrogen in fertilizers and septic tanks [2], best management practices to control nitrogen from fertilizers and septic tanks [8,9], and impacts of other hydrological parameters such as precipitation on nitrogen concentration [10] have been well documented. These works target mainly groundwater flow as it directly receives nitrogen in different ionic forms such as nitrate-nitrogen (NO3-N) and nitrite-nitrogen (NO2-N) from infiltration [11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%