2010
DOI: 10.1007/s00213-009-1773-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Precipitated and conditioned withdrawal in morphine-treated rats

Abstract: Rationale Stimuli that are paired with opioid withdrawal can themselves produce effects similar to withdrawal that might promote relapse. Objective This study compared precipitated and conditioned withdrawal, and tested whether withdrawal is modified by clonidine or morphine. Methods Morphine-treated rats (10 mg/kg/12 h) received naloxone (3.2 mg/kg) in a novel environment (conditioned stimuli=CS). Other rats received naloxone in the absence of the CS. Body weight and observable signs were used to measure … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, adolescents showed body weight loss only in one of the three experiments, and only after repeated administration of the highest dose examined. Body weight loss is a prominent somatic sign of opioid withdrawal, apparent from one to at most eight days after discontinuation of repeated intermittent opioid administration, in adult rats (e.g., Langerman et al 2001; Becker et al 2010) and mice (e.g., Pappaleo and Contarino 2006). The present findings therefore suggest the possibility that adolescents are less sensitive to opioid withdrawal than adults, consistent with reports that adolescent mice show less affective withdrawal from morphine than do adults, as measured in the forced swim test (Hodgson et al 2009), and that adolescent rats show less physical withdrawal (somatic signs and body weight loss) from heroin than do adults (Doherty and Frantz 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, adolescents showed body weight loss only in one of the three experiments, and only after repeated administration of the highest dose examined. Body weight loss is a prominent somatic sign of opioid withdrawal, apparent from one to at most eight days after discontinuation of repeated intermittent opioid administration, in adult rats (e.g., Langerman et al 2001; Becker et al 2010) and mice (e.g., Pappaleo and Contarino 2006). The present findings therefore suggest the possibility that adolescents are less sensitive to opioid withdrawal than adults, consistent with reports that adolescent mice show less affective withdrawal from morphine than do adults, as measured in the forced swim test (Hodgson et al 2009), and that adolescent rats show less physical withdrawal (somatic signs and body weight loss) from heroin than do adults (Doherty and Frantz 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, in the rodent model, both avoidance of the taste cue and the onset of aversive taste reactivity behavior predict the latency to take drug, the length of the load up period, and the speed with which rats will acquire cocaine self-administration behavior (Wheeler et al, 2008). Therefore, unlike LiCl, cues that predict drugs of abuse can lead to a conditioned aversive state involving craving and withdrawal (Becker, Gerak, Li, Koek, & France, 2010; McDonald, et al, 1997, see Grigson, 2008, for a review). The TOA, then, may be involved in the development and/or expression of this more complex process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is unlikely, however, because there is also a 5 min ISI in the LiCl-induced CTA paradigm. However, unlike LiCl, cues that predict drugs of abuse can lead to a conditioned aversive state involving craving and withdrawal (Becker, et al, 2010; McDonald, et al, 1997). According to Wheeler et al (2011), when an intraorally infused taste cue predicts delayed access to drug, the CS elicits aversive responses such as decreased accumbens dopamine and aversive orofacial responses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that assessment of above signs is not an issue of this study and in previous studies, it has been studied by various dosages including our dosages (Becker, Gerak, Li, Koek, & France, 2010). Age can also influence the mechanism of sensitization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%