2005
DOI: 10.1007/s10853-005-3154-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Precipitate growth activation energy requirements in the duplex size γ′ distribution in the superalloy IN738LC

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 24-hour treatments give an intermediate value of 246 kJ/mol. This finding, in line with that reported by Roy et al, [37] shows that the coarsening becomes easier with longer aging time. This and the previous observations documented in the literature [36] suggest that activation energy is not constant but varies through different regimes of precipitate evolution.…”
Section: Kineticssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The 24-hour treatments give an intermediate value of 246 kJ/mol. This finding, in line with that reported by Roy et al, [37] shows that the coarsening becomes easier with longer aging time. This and the previous observations documented in the literature [36] suggest that activation energy is not constant but varies through different regimes of precipitate evolution.…”
Section: Kineticssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…8(a), merging of remnant precipitates with neighboring cooling ones has occurred. Such an agglomeration of coarse and fine precipitates has been reported by some investigators and presented as a precipitate growth mechanism [30][31][32]. Contrarily, the lack of cooling precipitates in the damaged microstructure after cycle A (Fig.…”
Section: Solution Treatment and Subsequent Coolingsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…where, Q e molar diffusion activation energy, (kJ mol À1 ) R e universal gas constant, (J mol À1 K À1 ), d 1 and d 2 are the average particle sizes (nm) at respective temperatures of T1 (K) and T2 (K), The above equation is obtained by substituting the precipitate size data for respective tempering temperatures and time in Equations (2) and (3), where the value of d 0 is assumed as very small and negligible [17,18].…”
Section: Microstructurementioning
confidence: 99%