1963
DOI: 10.2307/278281
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preceramic Archaic Sites in the Highlands of Honduras

Abstract: Recent work in the mountains of Honduras has disclosed four ceramic and ten preceramic sites all between altitudes of 5000 and 6500 feet. Fluted stemmed points, medium-sized scrapers, and very small side scrapers link the preceramic sites to late Paleo-Indian or early Archaic times. Stonework from the ceramic sites is typologically different. Migration routes at these altitudes are suggested.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the basis of physical evidence collected during stratigraphic excavations, we believe that the rockshelter existed much as it does today throughout the period of human occupation. The possibility of early occupation in the region was first suggested by Bullen and Plowden (1963) and later reiterated by MacNeish MacNeish and Nelken-Terner 1983). Bullen and Plowden originally argued for a Paleoindian occupation based on the presence of aceramic sites with bifacial projectile points made of obsidian.…”
Section: El Gigante Rocksheltermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the basis of physical evidence collected during stratigraphic excavations, we believe that the rockshelter existed much as it does today throughout the period of human occupation. The possibility of early occupation in the region was first suggested by Bullen and Plowden (1963) and later reiterated by MacNeish MacNeish and Nelken-Terner 1983). Bullen and Plowden originally argued for a Paleoindian occupation based on the presence of aceramic sites with bifacial projectile points made of obsidian.…”
Section: El Gigante Rocksheltermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bullen and Plouden (1963) found "Archaic" points in Honduras but they were side notched, weak shouldered, and made of obsidian; some had long, narrow stems. Bullen and Plouden (1963) found "Archaic" points in Honduras but they were side notched, weak shouldered, and made of obsidian; some had long, narrow stems.…”
Section: Preceramic Neighborsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the six known Costa Rican examples, one is Type 3 and the rest are either Type 1 or Type 2, which is similar to the classic western Clovis. Farther north in Guatemala and Mexico, all known fluted points are Type 1 or Type 2; the so-called fishtail points found some years ago in Honduras (Bullen and Plowden 1963) are not now considered to be paleo-Indian (Roberto Reyes Mazzoni, personal communication). Gruhn and Bryan (1977:262-264), among others, have suggested that the fluted point tradition arose in south-central North America among people who simultaneously maintained the much longer established tradition of foraging, along with its different tool kit.…”
Section: Summary and Significance Of The Sitementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cerro Mangote, a coastal shell midden site also dating to 7000-6000 B.P., is likewise characterized by manos, metates, and other ground stone implements (McGimsey 1956(McGimsey , 1958. In Honduras (Bullen and Plowden 1963), stemmed projectile points have been found which are apparently preceramic, but they are unlike the fishtail (Magellan) points typical of MacNeish's Stage IV in Panama and much of South America.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%