2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.02.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preceding Inhibition Silences Layer 6 Neurons in Auditory Cortex

Abstract: Summary A canonical feedforward circuit is proposed to underlie sensory cortical responses with balanced excitation and inhibition in layer 4 (L4). However, in another input layer, L6, sensory responses and the underlying synaptic circuits remain largely unclear. Here, cell-attached recordings in rat primary auditory cortex revealed that for the majority of L6 excitatory neurons, tonal stimuli did not drive spike responses, but suppressed spontaneous firings. Whole-cell recordings further revealed that the sil… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

23
134
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(158 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
(161 reference statements)
23
134
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous findings that the deep-layer current sink was sometimes reduced by muscimol may reflect the use of doses Ͼ1 mM (indeed, in our experiments higher doses also could reduce the layer 5/6 response), but overall previous results are generally consistent with a strong thalamocortical contribution (Cruikshank et al 2002;Happel et al 2010;Zhou et al 2010). However, intracellular recordings show that the thalamocortical inputs to layer 5/6 can activate inhibition (Zhou et al 2010), which indicates activation of cortical circuits. Thus the lack of an intracortical contribution in our study may result, in part, from methodology (e.g., level and type of anesthesia), and intracortical activity may be evoked more readily in other conditions, such as during behavior.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Previous findings that the deep-layer current sink was sometimes reduced by muscimol may reflect the use of doses Ͼ1 mM (indeed, in our experiments higher doses also could reduce the layer 5/6 response), but overall previous results are generally consistent with a strong thalamocortical contribution (Cruikshank et al 2002;Happel et al 2010;Zhou et al 2010). However, intracellular recordings show that the thalamocortical inputs to layer 5/6 can activate inhibition (Zhou et al 2010), which indicates activation of cortical circuits. Thus the lack of an intracortical contribution in our study may result, in part, from methodology (e.g., level and type of anesthesia), and intracortical activity may be evoked more readily in other conditions, such as during behavior.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…The layer 4 sink had an onset latency of 16.5 Ϯ 0.78 ms (n ϭ 22), which is shorter than that of the layer 2/3 sink (20.5 Ϯ 1.88 ms; paired t-test, P ϭ 0.029) and longer than that of the layer 5/6 sink (13.1 Ϯ 1.57 ms, P Ͻ 0.001). The laminar location, latency, and duration of the layer 5/6 current sink suggest that it results from a collateral of the main thalamocortical projection to layer 4, as noted previously (Cruikshank et al 2002;Romanski and LeDoux 1993;Zhou et al 2010), and the difference in onset latencies over a distance of 300 m implies a conduction velocity of ϳ0.1 m/s, consistent with intracortical (unmyelinated axon) velocities (Salami et al 2003). The onset latency of the layer 2/3 sink is considerably longer than expected for a monosynaptic input, since a similar conduction velocity over the additional 100-m distance from layer 4 should add only ϳ1 ms to the latency (instead of the observed ϳ4 ms).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 60%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…fear conditioning | operant conditioning | optogenetics | neuronal inhibition | auditory cortex C ortical neurons exhibit spontaneous activity without explicit external stimuli (1-3), which may not only increase, but also be suppressed, by sensory stimuli (4,5). For example, auditory stimuli suppress a subset of auditory cortical neurons in a frequency-dependent manner (5).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%