2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.red.2017.12.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Precautionary saving in a Markovian earnings environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…observed, then t = aE (y t ) k where a and k are positive constants and k goes to zero as b 1 goes to zero: A disadvantage of quadratic utility however is that for large wealth and therefore consumption above the "bliss point," marginal utility can become negative, creating complications. For an excellent recent treatment of the Markovian income process see Light (2016).…”
Section: Overlapping Generations (Olg)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…observed, then t = aE (y t ) k where a and k are positive constants and k goes to zero as b 1 goes to zero: A disadvantage of quadratic utility however is that for large wealth and therefore consumption above the "bliss point," marginal utility can become negative, creating complications. For an excellent recent treatment of the Markovian income process see Light (2016).…”
Section: Overlapping Generations (Olg)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…observed, then t = aE (y t ) k where a and k are positive constants and k goes to zero as b 1 goes to zero: A disadvantage of quadratic utility however is that for large wealth and therefore consumption above the "bliss point," marginal utility can become negative, creating complications. For an excellent recent treatment of the Markovian income process see Light (2016). 27 When the earnings distribution is a …nite Markov chain however it is necessarily thin-tailed and typically all its moments exist.…”
Section: Overlapping Generations (Olg)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is easy to see that p is convexitypreserving and monotone. Furthermore, when u ′ is convex then the policy function g(s, p) is increasing in p with respect to the convex order, i.e., g(s, p 2 ) ≥ g(s, p 1 ) whenever p 2 CX p 1 (see Light (2018a)). Thus, part (ii) of Proposition 4 implies that when the labor income uncertainty increases (i.e., p 2 CX p 1 ), both the highest partial equilibrium (when R is fixed) wealth inequality and the lowest partial equilibrium wealth inequality increase (i.e., λ 2 ICX λ 1 ).…”
Section: Comparisons Of Stationary Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%