2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.06.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Precategorical acoustic storage and the perception of speech

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
30
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
7
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, our finding of opposite effects of sensory detail and prior knowledge in the STG is without precedent in previous studies of the perception of degraded speech and is inconsistent with accounts in which any enhancement to the perceived clarity of speech is accompanied by a corresponding increase in STG activity. It is, however, in agreement with the finding that recall of degraded spoken words from echoic memory is determined solely by the fidelity of sensory input rather than perceived clarity from topdown influences (Frankish, 2008). This suggests that, although sensory information and prior knowledge both enhance perceptual clarity, their effects can be dissociated by other behavioral measures and, as demonstrated here, by neural responses in the STG.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Thus, our finding of opposite effects of sensory detail and prior knowledge in the STG is without precedent in previous studies of the perception of degraded speech and is inconsistent with accounts in which any enhancement to the perceived clarity of speech is accompanied by a corresponding increase in STG activity. It is, however, in agreement with the finding that recall of degraded spoken words from echoic memory is determined solely by the fidelity of sensory input rather than perceived clarity from topdown influences (Frankish, 2008). This suggests that, although sensory information and prior knowledge both enhance perceptual clarity, their effects can be dissociated by other behavioral measures and, as demonstrated here, by neural responses in the STG.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In addition, orally presented list-items would be associated with temporal cues that would not be generated by successively presented visual words. These temporal cues would then result in stronger memory traces and ensure higher recall for heard items (Frankish, 1985(Frankish, , 2008.…”
Section: Differences During Processing Of Auditory and Visually Presementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In favour of this hypothesis, these authors showed that the auditory advantage is even more pronounced when output interference is high. Alternatively it has been proposed that the auditory advantage that extends over the last few serial positions is retrieved independently for each item from an echoic trace (Frankish, 2008). According to this author, pronounced recency in immediate serial recall is limited to stimuli that engage the perceptual mechanism involved in linguistic decoding of speech.…”
Section: Visualmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations