Precarity and professional identity in the context of institutional change

Volchik, Vyacheslav; Posukhova, Oxana

doi:10.18522/2073-6606-2016-14-2-159-173

Cited by 10 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…40% опрошенных сообщили, что после начала эпидемии у них сократилась зарплата. С февраля до мая 2020 г. у 24% опрошенных плата сократилась менее чем на четверть, у 14% -от четверти до половины, у 19% -более чем наполовину 26 .…”

Section: фактические проявления общественного договора о реализации норм трудового праваunclassified

“…К аспектам психологии относятся также страх негативных последствий со стороны работодателя, опасение предстать конфликтным, «проблемным» работником. В отдельных 25 Available at: URL: https://www.rbc.ru/society/10/03/2021/60476c189a7947566073437c (дата обращения: 08.07.2021) 26 Available at: URL: https://thebell.io/materialnoe-polozhenie-vse-slozhno-tsentr-trudovyhissledovanij-vshe-o-bezrabotitse-i-padenii-dohodov (дата обращения: 08.07.2021) 27 Данные Судебного департамента при Верховном Суде Российской Федерации. Available at: URL: http://www.cdep.ru/index.php?id=79 (дата обращения: 08.07.2021) областях предпринимательства устоялась практика «черных списков» работников, курсирующих между работодателями.…”

Section: психологические причиныunclassified

See 1 more Smart Citation

Public contract in the system of labour relations in modern Russia

Demidov¹

2021

Law. Journal of the HSE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Ключевые словатрудовое право, социально-трудовые отношения, работник, работодатель, социология трудового права, общественный договор, прекаризация труда, рынок труда Благодарности: статья опубликована в рамках проекта по поддержке публикаций авторов российских образовательных и научных организаций в научных изданиях НИУ ВШЭ.

show abstract

Section: фактические проявления общественного договора о реализации норм трудового праваunclassified

Section: психологические причиныunclassified

Public contract in the system of labour relations in modern Russia

Demidov¹

2021

Law. Journal of the HSE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Here we face a fundamental phenomenon of asynchrony of institutional and technological changes (Volchik 2008;Lisin and Strielkowski 2014;Koudelková et al 2015;Volchik and Posukhova 2016;Samašonok et al 2016;Raudeliūnienė et al 2016;Tvaronavičienė et al 2015;Lace et. Al.…”

Section: Literature Review: Performance and Increasing Returnsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Performance and Sustainability of Higher Education: Key Indicators Versus Academic Values

Volchik¹,

Maslyukova²

2017

JSSI

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. Reforming higher education and science in the world is associated with the widespread introduction of the indicators aimed at promoting their sustainability, productivity, and efficiency. The introduction of new educational technologies and the development of networks in education allow us to speak about the effect of increasing returns and mostly positive feedback. The instability inherent in such processes is an important factor for institutional change. Higher education and the professions associated with it, become large-scaled, which determines the use of indicators in the management plan. Exogenously introduced target indicators of development negatively affect the existing academic freedom and values, as well as hinder their reproduction. This paper attempts to understand the limitations of quantitative indicators and their impact on the adaptive strategies of the actors achieving them. We think that it is necessary to pay more attention to the problems of academic culture and values as important factors in both economic and social performance. It should be considered that education as a specific type of activity and institution is associated with the production of public goods and trust, and performs an important social function. We scrutinize the system of higher education through the prism of applying development target indicators as a tool of public policy. Our results seem to justify the importance of integrating institutions, values and self-governance mechanisms that promote long-term sustainable development.

show abstract

“…One may easily agree with the argument that an increase in the duration and coverage of higher and vocational education is sometimes considered as a factor of instability in the labor market. The massification of higher education leads to the fact that graduates can not find a job that meets their expectations for qualifications and pay (see Volchik and Posukhova, 2016).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Trust and development of education and science

Volchik¹,

Maslyukova²

2019

JESI

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Education and science play an increasingly significant role in the development of modern society as well as the economy. The number of years people spend on education has been steadily increasing over the past century, and this phenomenon has become truly global. Thence, one would probably agree that education strengthens its importance in social and economic life, and its development becomes an important indicator of the economic well-being and sustainable development of any given country. Our paper scrutinizes the indicators of development and trust in eduction and science using a case study from Russian Federation, a country where education has a very important, yet a dubious and debatable significance. In Russian society, a paradoxical situation has developed in many ways with attitudes in society towards the state of the education system, which is reflected in the gap in the desire to give their children (or grandchildren for that matter) the highest level of education coupled with a very low rate of assessment of this very education. We measure and apply the indicators of growth of science and education based on the the level of trust which is taken as a proxy of the quality of social capital. We show that a high level of trust characterizes social capital, which contributes to the establishment of depersonalized (impersonal) social ties, both outside and inside organizations. On the other hand, the low level of trust causes a dysfunction of management and complicates the formation of social ties and is characterized by the dominance of institutions that limit the possibilities of social and professional mobility. Our results and outcomes can be useful for constructing economic and social measures for supporting the growth of science and education as well as for finding the most effective pathways for achieving the sustainable development of this field which leads to the increase in the economic competitiveness of a country.

show abstract

Precarity and professional identity in the context of institutional change

Cited by 10 publications

References 2 publications

Public contract in the system of labour relations in modern Russia

Public contract in the system of labour relations in modern Russia

Performance and Sustainability of Higher Education: Key Indicators Versus Academic Values

Trust and development of education and science

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About