Precarious Labour Relations as a Factor of Social Pollution

Fyodorova, Alyona; Каташинских, В. С.; Dvořáková, Zuzana

doi:10.17059/2016-3-16

Cited by 7 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In scientific papers, labor force is estimated in terms of quantity and quality. Some authors put a focus on the parameters of quantitative labor security [3,4,5], while some others give priority to qualitative criteria such as education, health, and age [6,7,8,9].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Quantitative and qualitative indicators of safe (pseudo-safe) state of territory’s economy

Samoilova

2020

E3S Web Conf.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Human capital is the foundation of economic development at the territories, which indicates that its complex judgment is of priority. However, parameters that distort socio-economic reality will give a wrong idea of whether the territory’s economy is protected against threats; therefore, finding criteria to distinguish safe, conditionally safe, pseudo-safe and danger states of the economy take on special significance. In view of this, development of the system of indicators to estimate human capital has become vital, which has predetermined the purpose of the study implemented using the following methods: statistical analysis and qualitative assessment of systems. The set of the coefficients focuses on better objectivity of the study of human capital in terms of the influence it has on safety of the economy of the territory, since it considers the rate of changes in basic quantitative and qualitative indicators disclosing, on the one hand, availability of labor resources, on the other hand, satisfaction of the households’ needs.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Quantitative and qualitative indicators of safe (pseudo-safe) state of territory’s economy

Samoilova

2020

E3S Web Conf.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Additionally, exits-related topics such as comparative and international study can also be included: the individual and collective status of the worker [29]; equality and discrimination at work [30]; the transition to the world of work, public policies in labour matters [31]; changes in labour regulation [25]; vulnerable workers [32]; precarious employment [33]; labour productivity [34]; the effectiveness of international labour regulations [35], and; the labour market [36].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Worldwide Scientific Production Indexed by Scopus on Labour Relations

Alcayde

Manzano‐Agugliaro

2017

Publications

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article examines the features of the worldwide contributions to the specialized literature in labour relations in the period 1970-2016. The source considered has been the Scopus Elsevier database, together with bibliometric analysis techniques. Different aspects of the publications are analysed, such as publication type, field, language, subcategory and journal type, as well as the keyword occurrence frequency. The results of this work show that the most popular keywords were Trade Union, Employment, Labour Market and Industrial Relations. It is observed how the United States, being the most productive country, leads in almost all the keywords except in two, "Labour market" and "Working Conditions", which are led by UK. If the keywords are studied only as geographical terms we can find the United States, Eurasia and India. The contributions are geographically and institutionally broken down. The most active categories are Social Sciences, Business, and Management and Accounting. The evolution of the most popular keywords indicates how in the last years "Trade Unions" "Industrial Relations" and "Personnel" have lost importance against "Labor Market" and "Employment", showing new concerns in the labour relations field.

show abstract