1997
DOI: 10.1176/jnp.9.1.91
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preattentive and attentive eye movements during visual scanning of a cocaine cue: correlation with intensity of cocaine cravings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previously, for most substance use disorders, increased LPPs were consistently reported in relation to craving ( 20 22 ). Craving influences drug-seeking behavior ( 18 ) and has been associated with relapse in substance use disorders ( 14 , 32 ). In a recent study of craving using LPP, increased LPP amplitudes for drug-related cues relative to non-drug-related cues were found in individuals with cocaine use disorder; however, the LPP changes were reversed from baseline to 6–month follow-up with treatment, wherein the extent of LPP reversal was correlated with decreased craving at follow-up ( 18 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously, for most substance use disorders, increased LPPs were consistently reported in relation to craving ( 20 22 ). Craving influences drug-seeking behavior ( 18 ) and has been associated with relapse in substance use disorders ( 14 , 32 ). In a recent study of craving using LPP, increased LPP amplitudes for drug-related cues relative to non-drug-related cues were found in individuals with cocaine use disorder; however, the LPP changes were reversed from baseline to 6–month follow-up with treatment, wherein the extent of LPP reversal was correlated with decreased craving at follow-up ( 18 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We are aware of only one AB study with eye tracking involving cocaine users, which yielded evidence interpreted by the authors as offering support for AB among cocaine cues (Rosse et al, 1997; Rosse, Miller, Hess, Alim, & Deutsch, 1993). Given the existence of only one published study and the reliance on qualitatively different dependent variables in eye tracking compared to reaction time tasks, we did not include the Rosse et al (1993; 1997) findings in our review of behavioral effects of AB discussed below.…”
Section: Ab As a Cognitive Marker For Cudmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Methodologies commonly used in the addiction-related attentional bias literature include the visual/dot-probe task (e.g., Field et al, 2004; Lubman et al, 2000; Mogg et al, 2003), free viewing of naturalistic images (e.g., Rosse et al, 1993, 1997; Wong et al, 2006; Volkow et al, 2006) or the completion of a secondary task while viewing naturalistic images (e.g., Luijten et al, 2011, 2012; Nickolaou et al, 2013a), and the addiction-Stroop task in which drug-related words serve as task-irrelevant input (e.g., Carpenter et al, 2006; Cox et al, 2002; Marissen et al, 2006; see Cox et al, 2006, for a meta-analysis). Studies of value-driven attention in non-clinical samples, in contrast, tend to use simple visual stimuli in tasks designed to isolate spatial-attentional competition between the target and a distractor, such as the additional singleton and visual search paradigms (e.g., Anderson et al, 2011a, 2011b, 2014; Chelazzi et al, 2014; Feldmann-Wustefeld et al, 2016; Lee and Shomstein, 2014); however, the visual/dot-probe task (e.g., Failing and Theeuwes, 2014; Muller et al, 2016; Pool et al, 2014; Stankevich and Geng, 2014; Sun et al, in press), naturalistic images (Anderson, 2015; Hickey and Peelen, 2015), free viewing methods (Anderson and Yantis, 2012; Yamamoto et al, 2013), and the Stroop task (Krebs et al, 2010, 2011) have also been employed in the study of value-driven attention.…”
Section: Comparison Of Experimental Paradigmsmentioning
confidence: 99%