1967
DOI: 10.1016/0375-9601(67)90540-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preasymptotic form of impurity screening in a metal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1972
1972
1985
1985

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 for a representative A,Cu alloy. Evidently Alfred and Van Ostenburg's [15] 8n(r) given by the last two terms of (10) deviates from the self-consistent calculations almost completely for r < 5 at. units.…”
Section: Electronic Charge Distributionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3 for a representative A,Cu alloy. Evidently Alfred and Van Ostenburg's [15] 8n(r) given by the last two terms of (10) deviates from the self-consistent calculations almost completely for r < 5 at. units.…”
Section: Electronic Charge Distributionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The parameters A, cp, B, and are evaluated in the same manner as done by Alfred and Van Ostenburg [15] and used then in (10) to obtain C and D by the method of least-squares fit.…”
Section: Electronic Charge Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phase differences between the oscillations of the quadratic and linear response and also between the self-consistent and linear results at medium distances (see Fig. 2) are caused by different preasymptotic behaviour (already the linear response gives an term [24]) and must vanish a t large distances.…”
Section: ) F(e)(r) and F @ ) [ R )mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…propriately weighted wipe-out number /Brettell and Heeger 3/ The theoretical refinements reported in [25], which are thought to be negligible in the asymptotic region.…”
Section: The Transition Regionmentioning
confidence: 99%