Preadaptative Transactions and Institutional Change: Wolf‐critical activism in southwestern Finland

Abstract

Finland has had problems protecting the grey wolf (Canis lupus) for decades. Over the past few years, the government of Finland has taken several steps to improve its policy on wolves. In this paper, we explore the grassroots activism that institutional adjustments have triggered. This work builds on ethnographic presence in two southwestern Finnish wolf territories. Theoretically, we draw from institutional theory and use transactions as the unit of analysis. We identify four ways in which wolf-critical civil society has provided an institutional basis for particular changes: (i) questioning the purity of the wolf, (ii) making scientific evidence fallible, (iii) producing negative emotional effects and (iv) maintaining strong policy pressure against the presence of the wolf. In the discussion, we explain how these modifications have functioned. Actors critical of the wolf have exercised the politics of disturbance, produced various epistemic cues and created conditions for reframing existing rights and the emergence of new ones. Due to these bottom-up preadaptive transactions, wolf-policy-related institutional adjustments have, in many respects, taken on volitional and spontaneous features.

Homecoming without Nostalgia: Local Communities and the Reintroduction of the Wild Forest Reindeer (Rangifer tarandus sennicus) in Finland

“…The wolf returns spontaneously, without active assistance, and reclaims the lands that were once its territories. The landscape of return has become problematic for the wolf, because it is fragmented by infrastructure, human activity and a relatively strong resistance among humans in Finland (Hiedanpää and Pellikka 2017a). Contrary to this, many people are…”

Rethinking wildlife management : Living with wild animals

“…These situations occur, at least in part, because protected areas and wildlife refuges have increasingly become islands in the middle of human-dominated landscapes. As a result, the respective wild animals become increasingly seen as pests, invasives, and are generally disliked in these human-dominated landscapes (Hiedanpää & Pellikka, 2017;Knight, 2000b;McKiernan & Instone, 2016). The consequences of such categorizations have been discussed in this thesis.…”