2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2020.10.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pre- vs. postoperative initiation of thromboprophylaxis in liver surgery

Abstract: Background: Thromboprophylaxis protocols in liver surgery vary greatly worldwide. Due to limited research, there is no consensus whether the administration of thromboprophylaxis should be initiated pre-or postoperatively. Methods: Patients undergoing liver resection in Helsinki University Hospital between 2014 and 2017 were reviewed retrospectively. Initiation of thromboprophylaxis was changed in the institution in the beginning of 2016 from postoperative to preoperative. Patients were classified into two grou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
12
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(29 reference statements)
0
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“… 18 Three studies involving patients post pancreatectomy, duodenectomy, and liver surgery have reported that rates of VTE is higher when chemoprophylaxis was given postoperatively than when it was commenced prior to surgery. 8 10 In contrast to our data, these studies reported on asymptomatic VTE, in smaller cohorts. This may explain their higher rates of VTE reported (10–20%) which is inconsistent with larger studies that describe symptomatic VTE.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“… 18 Three studies involving patients post pancreatectomy, duodenectomy, and liver surgery have reported that rates of VTE is higher when chemoprophylaxis was given postoperatively than when it was commenced prior to surgery. 8 10 In contrast to our data, these studies reported on asymptomatic VTE, in smaller cohorts. This may explain their higher rates of VTE reported (10–20%) which is inconsistent with larger studies that describe symptomatic VTE.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…These have largely focused on liver, pancreas, biliary, and colorectal operations 7 11 . However, these studies are typically single surgeon or single center in origin 8 10 and are underpowered to detect a true difference in the incidence of bleeding and/or VTE. 8 10 They include a heterogenous group of procedures with vastly different bleeding and VTE risk profiles 9 and often use asymptomatic VTE as an endpoint.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Doughtie et al [ 47 ] found that peri-operative PTP reduced the incidence of VTE (1.1% vs 6.1%, p = 0.05), but at increased risk of post-operative bleeding (10.9% vs 3.1%, p = 0.026) requiring intervention (reoperation, angiographic embolization, or percutaneous drainage for hematoma) in complex HPB surgeries. In contrast, Ainoa et al [ 34 ] noted a significant reduction in VTE events (1.2% vs 9.7%, p < 0.0001), especially PE (1.2% vs. 9.3%, p < 0.0001), without any increase in hemorrhagic ( p = 0.7186) or overall complications ( p = 0.98) with pre-operative initiation of PTP.ERAS® society endorses initiation of LMWH or UFH 2–12 h before surgery, particularly in major hepatectomies [ 69 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In contrast, all other reports investigating timing of perioperative chemoprophylaxis are either underpowered for both endpoints, or powered only to detect differences in bleeding. [11][12][13][15][16][17][18][21][22][23] This is not surprising, as the incidence of bleeding is typically much higher than clinical VTE across general surgery cohorts. 1 However, without considering both sides of the equation, these reports could not confidently recommend an optimal window for commencing chemoprophylaxis in the perioperative period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%