2004
DOI: 10.1007/s00531-004-0420-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pre-Variscan geological events in the Austrian part of the Bohemian Massif deduced from U–Pb zircon ages

Abstract: In an attempt to elucidate the pre-Variscan evolution history of the various geological units in the Austrian part of the Bohemian Massif, we have analysed zircons from 12 rocks (mainly orthogneisses) by means of SHRIMP, conventional multi-grain and single-grain UPb isotope-dilution/mass-spectrometry. Two of the orthogneisses studied represent Cadomian metagranitoids that formed at ca. 610 Ma (Spitz gneiss) and ca. 580 Ma (Bittesch gneiss). A metagranite from the Thaya batholith also gave a Cadomian zircon age… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
108
0
4

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 162 publications
(129 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(47 reference statements)
6
108
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…As summarised by Janoušek et al (2004), the protoliths to Gföhl gneisses/migmatites and felsic granulites seem predominantly Ordovician to Devonian in age (c. 470-430, 400 and 360 Ma: Wendt et al 1994;Kröner et al 2000;Friedl et al 2004). The granulitic rocks of the Gföhl Unit equilibrated at high pressures, corresponding to eclogite-facies conditions (O'Brien and Rötzler 2003;O'Brien 2006O'Brien , 2008, and were assembled and tectonically emplaced to higher crustal levels at around 340 Ma (Kröner et al 2000 and references therein).…”
Section: Gföhl Unitmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As summarised by Janoušek et al (2004), the protoliths to Gföhl gneisses/migmatites and felsic granulites seem predominantly Ordovician to Devonian in age (c. 470-430, 400 and 360 Ma: Wendt et al 1994;Kröner et al 2000;Friedl et al 2004). The granulitic rocks of the Gföhl Unit equilibrated at high pressures, corresponding to eclogite-facies conditions (O'Brien and Rötzler 2003;O'Brien 2006O'Brien , 2008, and were assembled and tectonically emplaced to higher crustal levels at around 340 Ma (Kröner et al 2000 and references therein).…”
Section: Gföhl Unitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1). Moreover, displaced segments of older basement are incorporated in the structure of the MZ, including the Palaeoproterozoic Světlík orthogneiss in southern Bohemia (Wendt et al 1993;Fiala et al 1995) and the Mesoproterozoic Dobra gneiss in Lower Austria (Gebauer and Friedl 1994;Friedl et al 2004). …”
Section: Subdivision Of the Moldanubian Zonementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Non-A-type Strzelin-Nowolesie orthogneisses, SW Poland, have zircon crystals with older inherited cores, igneous rims at 600 ± 7 Ma and metamorphic overgrowths at 568 ± 7 Ma (Oberc-Dziedzic et al 2003). The latter age is reminiscent of the 567 ± 5 Ma igneous age of A-type metagranite exposed as small massifs within the c. 600-580 Ma Thaya Batholith, Austria (Friedl et al 2004). These Ediacaran ages correspond to post-orogenic processes occurring after the Cadomian orogeny.…”
Section: Eastern Avaloniamentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The Neoproterozoic protolith ages of 540-580 Ma are typical of granitoids and orthogneisses of the Brunovistulian (van Breemen et al 1982;Scharbert and Batík 1985;Fritz et al 1996;Friedl et al 2000Friedl et al , 2004; see Leichmann and Höck 2008 for review) as well as Saxothuringian and Lugian domains (Hegner and Kröner 2000;Tichomirowa et al 2001;Linnemann et al 2008 and references therein) and they only rarely appear as protolith ages of Moldanubian orthogneisses (Schulmann et al 2005). Importantly, Cambrian ages of 500-520 Ma are absent in the Moravo-Silesian Domain (Brunia), but they are known as the most frequent protolith ages of the Moldanubian orthogneisses, as well as of some ortho gneisses in the Saxothuringian and Lugian domains (Vrána and Kröner 1995;Hegner and Kröner 2000;Tichomirowa et al 2001;Friedl et al 2004;Schulmann et al 2005). Zircons of this age found in the studied samples can be interpreted either as clastic grains coming directly from eroded Cambrian granitoids or volcanics, or they represent recycled crystals from sediments rich in clastic material of Cambrian age.…”
Section: Geochronological Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zircons of this age found in the studied samples can be interpreted either as clastic grains coming directly from eroded Cambrian granitoids or volcanics, or they represent recycled crystals from sediments rich in clastic material of Cambrian age. Ages older than 650 Ma are known from xenocrystic cores of younger zircons in Brunovistulian, Saxothuringian and Lugian orthogneisses as well as from orthogneisses and granulites of the Moldanubian Domain (Hegner and Kröner 2000;Kröner et al 2000;Tichomirowa et al 2001;Friedl et al 2004 and references therein).…”
Section: Geochronological Datamentioning
confidence: 99%