2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2019.02.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pre-treatment 18F-FDG PET-based radiomics predict survival in resected non-small cell lung cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
52
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
52
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the various machine-learning techniques, the advantage of RF in being able to predict features non-parametrically even if some features show collinearities with others suggests its suitability for texture analysis. Indeed, Ahn et al reported that an RF classifier provided higher diagnostic performance compared with other machine-learning algorithms, including support vector machine and neural network algorithms, for predicting the prognosis of lung cancer on FDG-PET 14 . The RF classifier technique shows promise for extraction of the most prognostic PET features.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Among the various machine-learning techniques, the advantage of RF in being able to predict features non-parametrically even if some features show collinearities with others suggests its suitability for texture analysis. Indeed, Ahn et al reported that an RF classifier provided higher diagnostic performance compared with other machine-learning algorithms, including support vector machine and neural network algorithms, for predicting the prognosis of lung cancer on FDG-PET 14 . The RF classifier technique shows promise for extraction of the most prognostic PET features.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radiomics offers new opportunities for developing a better understanding of oncological processes, enabling personalized therapy 6 , 11 . Some recent radiomics studies have used machine-learning methods such as support vector machines, neural networks, and random forest (RF) classifiers 14 16 that can improve the robustness of the statistical analysis 12 . However, few studies have explored the prognostic value of radiomics in pancreatic cancer using FDG-PET/CT with texture analysis 17 20 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in the study of Park et al, the SVM have shown to have a better predicting performance with an AUC of 0.86 comparing to 0.84 in the RF (40). Whereas it was contradictory in the prognosis prediction superiority between the RF and SVM in a study of lung cancer (54). Actually, the RF has a number of advantages, such as its totally non-parametric property, so that it can be used given the existence of collinearities among features (55).…”
Section: Predicting Pathological Grade Of Meningiomasmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The value of radiomics with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET for differential diagnosis and prognosis prediction has been reported for several malignancies, such as lung, breast, esophageal, and cervical cancers, and soft-tissue tumors 1217 . In addition, some recent radiomics studies have used machine-learning methods like support vector machines, neural networks, and random forest classifiers 1820 , enabling more robust statistical analysis 8 . However, the efficacy of radiomics using MET-PET for malignant brain tumor has not been investigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%