2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00520-015-2850-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pre-transplant arm muscle area: a simple measure to identify patients at risk

Abstract: The AMA measured pre-HSCT showed to be a potential predictor of acute GVHD and mortality up to 180 days after transplant in adult patients.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
7
2
5

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
7
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…2 Regarding BMI, our data showed few malnourished patients in pre-transplantation, as in other studies. 23 Although some studies have shown a positive association between BMI and overall survival, we did not nd such an association. BMI alone does not properly evaluate lean mass and fat mass changes and does not re ect patients' body composition, which helps to explain con icting literature results for HSCT outcomes in the elderly when only BMI or is considered.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 71%
“…2 Regarding BMI, our data showed few malnourished patients in pre-transplantation, as in other studies. 23 Although some studies have shown a positive association between BMI and overall survival, we did not nd such an association. BMI alone does not properly evaluate lean mass and fat mass changes and does not re ect patients' body composition, which helps to explain con icting literature results for HSCT outcomes in the elderly when only BMI or is considered.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 71%
“…On commencement of treatment, regardless of nutrition support route or anthropometric measure, most children maintained a satisfactory nutritional status either during nutrition support (37), or until discharge (19,38,40). Although weight and BMI were widely used, they are crude markers of nutritional status and do not provide details of body composition which is an important consideration for survival (45). Future studies should consider using MUAC or bioelectrical impedance as more sensitive markers of nutritional status (46).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[31][32][33] Both parameters lack information on body composition, which is considered to be of importance for survival. 34 Owing to conflicting data, there is still no consensus on which parameters best determine malnutrition, show a correlation with clinical outcomes and are reproduceable as well as easy to use in clinical practice. 3,8,35 Along with body composition, there is increasing interest in the effect of exercise on maintenance of muscle mass and survival.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%