The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2020
DOI: 10.1080/09658416.2020.1737706
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pre-service teachers’ beliefs about multilingualism in school: an evaluation of a course concept for introducing linguistically responsive teaching

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

5
22
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
5
22
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In spite of the substantial amount of research that has accumulated over the years, it is not difficult to discover that LRI studies have mostly concentrated in specific educational stages. In particular, discussions of LRI are largely focused on education training for pre‐ or in‐ service teachers of primary or secondary schools (Coady et al., 2011; Fischer & Lahmann, 2020; Tandon et al., 2017). Geographically, investigations into LRI have also been restricted to the United States or Europe (Fischer & Lahmann, 2020; Foley et al., 2018; Lucas & Villegas, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In spite of the substantial amount of research that has accumulated over the years, it is not difficult to discover that LRI studies have mostly concentrated in specific educational stages. In particular, discussions of LRI are largely focused on education training for pre‐ or in‐ service teachers of primary or secondary schools (Coady et al., 2011; Fischer & Lahmann, 2020; Tandon et al., 2017). Geographically, investigations into LRI have also been restricted to the United States or Europe (Fischer & Lahmann, 2020; Foley et al., 2018; Lucas & Villegas, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, discussions of LRI are largely focused on education training for pre‐ or in‐ service teachers of primary or secondary schools (Coady et al., 2011; Fischer & Lahmann, 2020; Tandon et al., 2017). Geographically, investigations into LRI have also been restricted to the United States or Europe (Fischer & Lahmann, 2020; Foley et al., 2018; Lucas & Villegas, 2011). This means that there are very limited studies conducted outside of these settings, even though MLLs clearly exist beyond school contexts and in other parts of the world (see Hillman, this issue).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…LRI has mostly been applied in pre-service teacher training programs as an approach for teaching English language learners in North American K-12 contexts (Berg & Huang, 2017;Fischer & Lahmann, 2020;Lucas, 2011;Lucas & Villegas, 2013;Martin & Strom, 2016;Tandon, Viesca, Hueston, & Milbourn, 2017;Wernicke, 2019). There are, however, relevant studies which have investigated pedagogical attitudes, beliefs, and practices related to providing language support in university discipline-specific content courses (Aguilar, 2015;Airey, 2012;Gallagher & Haan, 2018;Haan, Gallagher, & Varandani, 2017;Mancho-Bar es & Aguilar-P erez, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%