2012
DOI: 10.1039/c2rp20021j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pre-service primary science teachers' understandings of the effect of temperature and pressure on solid–liquid phase transition of water

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(45 reference statements)
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although there is a relational link between the boiling point and atmospheric pressure on one side, and a relational link between the boiling point and vapor pressure on the other side, this does not necessarily mean that there is a direct relationship between atmospheric pressure and vapor pressure. Learners' tendency to infer this non-existent direct relationship between atmospheric pressure and vapor pressure was also observed in previous studies (Canpolat et al, 2006;Yalcin, 2012).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although there is a relational link between the boiling point and atmospheric pressure on one side, and a relational link between the boiling point and vapor pressure on the other side, this does not necessarily mean that there is a direct relationship between atmospheric pressure and vapor pressure. Learners' tendency to infer this non-existent direct relationship between atmospheric pressure and vapor pressure was also observed in previous studies (Canpolat et al, 2006;Yalcin, 2012).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…In order to identify participants' mental models of vapor pressure, their conceptions about vapor pressure were first determined. This initial analysis of the participants' responses showed that the majority of the prospective chemistry teachers have misconceptions about vapor pressure that are similar to those documented in previous research (Azizog ˘lu et al, 2006;Canpolat, 2006;Canpolat et al, 2006;Yalcin, 2012). Identified misconceptions and the percentages of the participants who had each misconception are as follows:…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Moreover, pre-service teachers were unable to differentiate between boiling and evaporation (Valanides, 2000). Yalcin (2012) reported that pre-service primary science teachers had an inadequate understanding and some common misunderstandings regarding vaporization. Senocak (2009) revealed that primary school teachers with non-science backgrounds had many misconceptions about boiling phenomena, based on their daily life experiences and an inadequate knowledge of science.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This comparison proved that the results are not significantly different. The ability to change the volume of liquid inside the container is a major advantage of this experiment because some studies mention that a very common conceptual error is thinking that vapor pressure depends on the quantity of liquid and vapor present in the system. , …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%