2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2012.07.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pre-Rodinia supercontinent Nuna shaping up: A global synthesis with new paleomagnetic results from North China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
196
0
8

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 464 publications
(215 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
11
196
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…These rocks offer a rare glimpse into the mechanisms of climate change in the Mesoproterozoic Era (1,600 Ma to 1,000 Ma), and, with a precise chronostratigraphic framework, we are able to suggest an orbital control on climate and marine sedimentation. (31,32). There are suggestions that an active continental margin developed by the time of Xiamaling Formation deposition and that the Xiamaling Formation itself was deposited in a back-arc basin.…”
Section: Significancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These rocks offer a rare glimpse into the mechanisms of climate change in the Mesoproterozoic Era (1,600 Ma to 1,000 Ma), and, with a precise chronostratigraphic framework, we are able to suggest an orbital control on climate and marine sedimentation. (31,32). There are suggestions that an active continental margin developed by the time of Xiamaling Formation deposition and that the Xiamaling Formation itself was deposited in a back-arc basin.…”
Section: Significancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Paleomagnetic data suggest that the Xiamaling Formation was deposited in the northern tropics between about 10°N and 30°N latitude (31,32) on the western coast of the ancient supercontinent Nuna. This position would place the Xiamaling Formation right within the influence of Hadley Cell dynamics.…”
Section: Depositional Model For the Xiamaling Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, different paleogeographic scenarios of Columbia were proposed, mainly due to scarcity of high-quality paleomagnetic poles (e.g. Meert 2002, Zhao et al 2002, 2003, 2004, Pesonen et al 2003, Hou et al 2008a, 2008b, Johansson 2009, Rogers & Santosh 2009, Wingate et al 2009, Yakubchuk 2010, Evans & Mitchell 2011, Zhang et al 2012, Pisarevsky et al 2014among others).…”
Section: Columbia Supercontinentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rogers 1996, Rogers & Santosh 2002, Zhao et al 2002, 2003, 2004, Meert 2002, Pesonen et al 2003, Hou et al 2008a, 2008b, Johansson 2009, 2014, Yakubchuck 2010, Piper 2010, Evans & Mitchell 2011, Zhang et al 2012. This supercontinent has received different names: NENA (Gower et al 1990), NUNA (Hoffman 1997), Columbia (Rogers & Santosh 2002), or Paleopangea (Piper 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tectonically, this period was far from boring, since it involved the activity of the Columbia and Rodinia supercontinent (Zhang et al, 2012). Moreover, the evolution of Earth's biosphere, atmosphere, and hydrosphere is thought to tie with the continental movements (Campbell and Allen, 2008;Santosh, 2010;Young, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%