1987
DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9258(19)75763-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pre-replicative association of multiple replicative enzyme activities with the nuclear matrix during rat liver regeneration.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

1987
1987
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The involvement of CaM in DNA replication, inferred from the present studies, is consistent both with previous observations of proliferative activation-dependent association of CaM with the nuclear matrix (Pujol et al, 1989;Serratosa et al, 1988) [a suggested subcellular site for eukaryotic DNA replication (Nelson et al, 1986;Pardoll et al, 1980;Tubo & Berezney, 1987) ] and with studies demonstrating the association of CaM with active DNA (Bachs & Carafoli, 1987). There is evidence to suggest that Ca2+ and CaM participate in the early postreceptor events in the cellular mechanism of insulin action (Graves et al, 1986;Sacks et al, 1992;Sacks & McDonald, 1988) that stimulate the entry of mammalian cells from the G1 into the S phase (Campisi & Pardee, 1984).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The involvement of CaM in DNA replication, inferred from the present studies, is consistent both with previous observations of proliferative activation-dependent association of CaM with the nuclear matrix (Pujol et al, 1989;Serratosa et al, 1988) [a suggested subcellular site for eukaryotic DNA replication (Nelson et al, 1986;Pardoll et al, 1980;Tubo & Berezney, 1987) ] and with studies demonstrating the association of CaM with active DNA (Bachs & Carafoli, 1987). There is evidence to suggest that Ca2+ and CaM participate in the early postreceptor events in the cellular mechanism of insulin action (Graves et al, 1986;Sacks et al, 1992;Sacks & McDonald, 1988) that stimulate the entry of mammalian cells from the G1 into the S phase (Campisi & Pardee, 1984).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Since replication is proposed to occur at the level of the nuclear matrix (Smith & Berezney, 1982;Pardoll et al, 1980;Valenzuela et al, 1983;Foster & Collins, 1985), the preponderance of the DNA polymerase -DNA primase complex at that level, as a reflection of greater demands for chain initiation, might be expected. In this regard, while this paper was under review, Tubo and Berezney (1987) reported that rat liver nuclear matrix retains ribonuclease H activity, 3' to 5' exonuclease activity, and DNA methylase activity in addition to DNA polymerase a and DNA primase. They observed an increase in the amount of DNA polymerase a, ribonuclease H, DNA methylase, and DNA primase bound to the nuclear matrix before entry into the DNA synthetic phase, and thus, our data confirm theirs, with respect to DNA primase, in a different system.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…DNA primase activity was found to correlate with DNA synthesis in spleen and cardiac muscle cells during postnatal development . The activity of the DNA polymerase a-DNA primase complex increased during liver regeneration (Philippe et al, 1986;Tubo & Berezney, 1987). The amount of the DNA polymerase -DNA primase complex purified from synchronized cells was 8-fold greater during the S phase of the cell cycle than during G2 (Vishwanatha et al, 1986).…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Intracellular Ca2+ and CaM, increased in the late G1 period prior to the onset of DNA synthesis (S phase), have been shown to translocate to the nucleus and associate with the nuclear matrix (Pujol et al, 1989;Serratosa et al, 1988). Nuclear matrix is suggested to be the site for newly replicating DNA and contains the enzymes of DNA synthesis assembled into complex (Nelson et al, 1986;Tubo & Berezney, 1987). More recently, it was demonstrated that CaM-specific monoclonal antibodies markedly inhibit DNA replication in permeabilized fibroblasts (Reddy et al, 1992b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%