2021
DOI: 10.1186/s13031-021-00340-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pre-positioning an evaluation of cash assistance programming in an acute emergency: strategies and lessons learned from a study in Raqqa Governorate, Syria

Abstract: Background Conducting ethical and rigorous research to measure the effectiveness of humanitarian programs is urgently needed given the global level of displacement and conflict, yet traditional approaches to evaluation research may be too slow and disruptive for acute humanitarian settings. The current case study utilizes an experience of implementing a mixed methods evaluation conducted between March–August 2018 in northern Raqqa Governorate, Syria. The key research objectives were to examine … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, our manuscript introduces novelty to the literature and opens space for future research. Notably, there have been reports, and even systematic reviews, of the provision of cash-based assistance for people who live in the area of conflict [ 57 , 58 ]. However, such assistance is essentially different from the provision of medical support as presented herein.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, our manuscript introduces novelty to the literature and opens space for future research. Notably, there have been reports, and even systematic reviews, of the provision of cash-based assistance for people who live in the area of conflict [ 57 , 58 ]. However, such assistance is essentially different from the provision of medical support as presented herein.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach visualizes the timeframe in which the participants were asked to recall information throughout the interview by drawing a timeline of their life while asking questions from the interview guide by period in the conflict: pre-recruitment, recruitment, and post-recruitment. The life-line technique is a recommended best practice for qualitative research on past experiences of violence [ 33 ], and has been used for research on conflict experiences [ 34 ] and research with children [ 35 ]. The guide included questions on their household dynamics and experiences during each of these periods and how they changed over time, as well as why they did or did not engage with armed groups and how they reintegrated into their families and communities.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…
transfers [1], promoting better education for children [2], advancing mental health and psychosocial programming for people affected by disaster [3], and improving the safety and wellbeing of women and children in conflictaffected zones [4,5]. Methodologies have also advanced substantially such that studies can be pre-positioned for acute crises to promote the effectiveness of anticipatory action or find creative approaches to build comparison groups that do not delay receipt of aid, but rather ethically exploit organic programmatic delivery cycles and targeting procedures [6] or use propensity score matching approaches [7]. Nonetheless, while the generation of rigorous evidence of impact has increased, the ability to reach scale, sustainability, and equity across settings within humanitarian programming has been suboptimal.
BackgroundDelivering evidence-based programming in humanitarian crises grappling with war, climate change, and disaster is a formidable challenge.
…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%