1989
DOI: 10.1029/tc008i001p00099
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pre‐Pliocene Extension around the Gulf of California and the transfer of Baja California to the Pacific Plate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

9
318
2
12

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 383 publications
(341 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(17 reference statements)
9
318
2
12
Order By: Relevance
“…The formation of the GoC extensional province occurred in two phases: in the first stage the extension and continental separation formed continental marine basins, whereas during the second phase, a period of seafloor expansion and creation of transform faults took place, and these latter processes continue today (Stock and Hodges, 1989;Oskin et al, 2001;Bennett et al, 2007). As a consequence, the crustal structure at the margins of GoC is different with respect to the crustal structure along the plate boundary within the GoC (Fletcher and Munguía, 2000).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The formation of the GoC extensional province occurred in two phases: in the first stage the extension and continental separation formed continental marine basins, whereas during the second phase, a period of seafloor expansion and creation of transform faults took place, and these latter processes continue today (Stock and Hodges, 1989;Oskin et al, 2001;Bennett et al, 2007). As a consequence, the crustal structure at the margins of GoC is different with respect to the crustal structure along the plate boundary within the GoC (Fletcher and Munguía, 2000).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The evolution of the GoC is related to different tectonic processes, which began with the subduction of the Farallón plate and followed by continental and oceanic rift processes (Stock and Hodges, 1989;Atwater and Stock, 1998;Axen et al, 2000). Subsequently, the GoC was generated by the tectonic interaction of the Farallón, North America, and Pacific plates (Atwater, 1989;Martin-Barajas, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6] Subduction along northwestern Mexico ended from 17 to 12 Ma in a series of ridge jumps and microplate captures [Lonsdale, 1991;Stock and Hodges, 1989] that brought the Pacific and North American plates into contact along a transtensional margin. Although Pacific -North American plate motion was localized in the Gulf of California by 6 Ma [Oskin and Stock, 2003] and seafloor spreading in the gulf accommodated >85% of plate motion by 3.5 Ma [DeMets, 1995], how plate motion was accommodated during the ''proto-Gulf'' period (12 -6 Ma) is not well known and remains controversial [e.g., Stock and Hodges, 1989;Gans, 1997;Henry and Aranda-Gomez, 2000;Gans et al, 2003].…”
Section: Tectonic Overview Of Nw Mexicomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although vast regions of northern Mexico are believed to have experienced significant crustal extension during the Tertiary [Henry and Aranda-Gomez, 1992], the timing, magnitude, kinematics, spatial patterns and style of extension in this region remain poorly known. As a result, the driving forces of this extension and its relationship to the plate boundary change from subduction to transtension during the Miocene remain uncertain [Stock and Hodges, 1989;Gans, 1997;Henry and Aranda-Gomez, 2000].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The formation of the left step 'big bend' in the San Andreas fault occurred 12-4 Myr ago (Crowell 1968;Atwater 1970;Stock & Hodges 1989;Wright 1991) and is the most likely source of oblique convergence in southern California (Crowell 1968). Pacific plate motion relative to North America is now oriented in a NW direction, approximately parallel to the San Andreas fault in central California.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%