Pre-ordering lunch at work. Results of the what to eat for lunch study

Stites, Shana D.; Singletary, S. Brook; Menasha, Adeena; Cooblall, Clarissa; Hantula, Donald A.; Axelrod, Saul; Figueredo, Vincent M.; Phipps, Etienne

doi:10.1016/j.appet.2014.10.005

Cited by 40 publications

(82 citation statements)

References 49 publications

(52 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The search yielded twenty-three studies (twenty-four papers) in overweight/obese subjects (11,13,14,16,(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38)(39)(40)(41)(42)(43) and twenty-nine papers describing interventions in normal-weight subjects (15,18,34,(44)(45)(46)(47)(48)(49)(50)(51)(52)(53)(54)(55)(56)(57)(58)(59)(60)(61) .…”

Section: Results -Intervention Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…A couple of the studies had a mindfulness component as part of an education programme, with an ACT (42) and MB-EAT (36) basis and were similar to the studies where weight loss was observed. Other studies had a narrower focus, for example internal cues (26) , mindful eating (29) and mindful breathing (41) , and tended to have shorter duration of 4-8 weeks.…”

Section: Nutrition Research Reviewsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Where do you go from here? (14,24,26,29,34,35,41,42) 3 (normal weight) 2 positive (34,55) 33 1 negative (54) Physiological risk factors ‡ 2 (overweight/obese) 2 positive (13,26) Glycaemic control 1 (overweight/obese diabetics) 1 neutral/mixed (14) Eating behaviours Binge eating 9 (overweight/obese) 9 positive (11,13,16,27,29,33,35,39,42) 100 4 (normal weight) 4 positive (45,49,60,61) 100 Emotional eating 10 (overweight/obese) 7 positive (11,25,30,31,33,35,39) 70 3 neutral/mixed (29,42,43) 1 (normal weight) 1 neutral/mixed (54) External eating 5 (overweight/obese) 4 positive (25,28,31,38) 80 1 neutral/mixed (42) 1 (normal weight) 1 positive (61) Cravings 1 (overweight/obese) 1 positive (24) 3 (normal weight) 3 neutral/mixed (46,…”

Section: Nutrition Research Reviewsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Many of the interventions had small sample sizes of fifty or fewer subjects: fourteen of the overweight/obese studies (11,13,24,25,(27)(28)(29)(31)(32)(33)37,41,43) , and ten of the studies in normal-weight populations (45,(47)(48)(49)51,54,(58)(59)(60)(61) . Three of the studies in the overweight/obese populations were carried out among children (28,29,40) ; one of these studies had a sample size of more than 300 but the results of this study were not clearly described (40) .…”

Section: Characteristics Of the Intervention Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Initial search yielded n 99 papers (25,27,33,40) Mindful eating Four studies (28,29,36,43) MBSR Three studies (13,30,54) Mindfulness Three studies (11,32,35,44) Mindful eating and MB-EAT Three studies (14,16,38,41) Mindfulness-based action committed therapy Two studies (38,42) Combination of MBSR, MBCT and MB-EAT One study (31) Acceptance-based behaviour intervention One study (37) Acceptance of cravings One study (24) Intuitive eating One study (26) MBCT, mindfulness-based cognitive therapy; MBSR, Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction; MB-EAT, Mindfulness-Based Eating Awareness Training.…”

Section: Nutrition Research Reviewsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

A structured literature review on the role of mindfulness, mindful eating and intuitive eating in changing eating behaviours: effectiveness and associated potential mechanisms

Warren¹,

2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The role of mindfulness, mindful eating and a newer concept of intuitive eating in modulating eating habits is an area of increasing interest. In this structured literature review, a summary of the current evidence is presented, together with details of interventions undertaken and the tools to measure outcomes. It is broad in scope given the emerging evidence base in this area. The review yielded sixty-eight publications: twenty-three interventions in obese/overweight populations; twenty-nine interventions in normal-weight populations; sixteen observational studies, three of which were carried out in overweight/obese populations. Mindfulness-based approaches appear most effective in addressing binge eating, emotional eating and eating in response to external cues. There is a lack of compelling evidence for the effectiveness of mindfulness and mindful eating in weight management. Mindfulness-based approaches may prevent weight gain. Reduced food intake was seen in some of the studies in overweight and obese populations, but this was less apparent in the studies in normal-weight populations. The evidence base for intuitive eating is limited to date and further research is needed to examine its potential in altering eating behaviours. Mindfulness appears to work by an increased awareness of internal, rather than external, cues to eat. Mindfulness and mindful eating have the potential to address problematic eating behaviours and the challenges many face with controlling their food intake. Encouraging a mindful eating approach would seem to be a positive message to be included in general weight management advice to the public.

show abstract

Section: Results -Intervention Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Nutrition Research Reviewsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Nutrition Research Reviewsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Characteristics Of the Intervention Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Nutrition Research Reviewsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

A structured literature review on the role of mindfulness, mindful eating and intuitive eating in changing eating behaviours: effectiveness and associated potential mechanisms

Warren¹,

2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Effects of informational nudges on preordered food choices of middle school National School Lunch Program participants

Kropp,

Gupta

2024

J of Agr & App Econ Assoc

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We examine the effects of own order history, peer order history, and MyPlate nudges received by middle‐school National School Lunch Program (NSLP) participants while preordering on the selection of fruits and vegetables. Students receiving own order history nudges were significantly less likely to select a vegetable during the postintervention phase. Students who received peer order history nudges were significantly less likely to select a vegetable during the nudging and postintervention phases, suggesting that receiving information on peer selection negatively impacted the selection of vegetables. The MyPlate recommendations nudge may mitigate the negative effects of receiving peer selection information.

show abstract