2019
DOI: 10.3390/cancers11030294
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pre-Operative Versus Post-Operative Radiosurgery of Brain Metastases—Volumetric and Dosimetric Impact of Treatment Sequence and Margin Concept

Abstract: Background: Pre-operative radiosurgery (SRS) preceding the resection of brain metastases promises to circumvent limitations of post-operative cavity SRS. It minimizes uncertainties regarding delineation and safety margins and could reduce dose exposure of the healthy brain (HB). Methods: We performed a systematic treatment plan comparison on 24 patients who received post-operative radiosurgery of the resection cavity at our institution. Comparative treatment plans were calculated for hypofractionated stereotac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Target volume delineation and treatment planning for SRT were based on high-resolution contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT), as well as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans and carried out as previously described. 27 , 28 Employed safety margins depended on treatment technique and ranged between 1 mm for CyberKnife and 2-3 mm for LINAC-based radiosurgery. The target volume for post-operative SRT encompassed the resection cavity with a safety margin of 3-4 mm.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Target volume delineation and treatment planning for SRT were based on high-resolution contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT), as well as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans and carried out as previously described. 27 , 28 Employed safety margins depended on treatment technique and ranged between 1 mm for CyberKnife and 2-3 mm for LINAC-based radiosurgery. The target volume for post-operative SRT encompassed the resection cavity with a safety margin of 3-4 mm.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The potential advantages of pre-operative SRS are as follows: (1) tumor is easy to identify and contour; (2) expansion margin is not required for target delineation uncertainty; (3) dose is often reduced by 20% given better oxygenation of intact tumor and planned surgery; and (4) there is potentially a reduction in leptomeningeal disease (LMD) risk following surgery [ 37 ]. When treating intact brain metastases with planned pre-operative SRS, the expansion margin is typically 0–1 mm with no utilization of volumetric expansion (i.e., GTV = PTV) being most commonly employed [ 37 , 49 , 54 ]. The lack of PTV margin and radiation dose reduction with planned pre-operative SRS reduces the volume of healthy brain tissue receiving 10–12 Gy, which are volumes that have been associated with increased RN [ 10 , 27 , 29 , 37 , 49 , 55 , 56 ].…”
Section: Optimal Approach For Utilizing Surgery and Srsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Improved systemic cancer treatment has resulted in prolonged survival of patients with brain metastases, thereby demanding long-term local control after the treatment course is completed. The brain metastases are usually delineated by referring to contrast-enhanced 3D T1-weighted (CE-3D-T1W) MRI, which is subsequently co-registered to the planning CT [1]. Recently, the importance of contrast-enhanced 3D fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (CE-3D-FLAIR) MRI was demonstrated in various intracranial pathological disorders by comparing with CE-3D-T1W [2,3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%