2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-55953-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pre-disaster social support is protective for onset of post-disaster depression: Prospective study from the Great East Japan Earthquake & Tsunami

Abstract: We examined whether pre-disaster social support functions as a disaster preparedness resource to mitigate post-disaster depressive symptoms among older survivors of the 2011 Great East Japan earthquake and tsunami. The participants were 3,567 individuals aged ≥65 years living in Iwanuma city who completed a baseline survey as part of the nationwide Japan Gerontological Evaluation Study seven months before the disaster. A follow-up survey was administered approximately 2.5 years after the disaster. The analysis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
31
1
3

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
2
31
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, our measurement of depressive symptoms was based only on the GDS scores, without corroborating clinical evaluation may not be very accurate. However, the GDS is a validated instrument for assessing depressive symptoms and is used widely [ 38 , 40 , 41 , 48 , 70 ]. Third, it is unknown whether these findings are generalizable beyond the Yangon and Bago regions of Myanmar.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Second, our measurement of depressive symptoms was based only on the GDS scores, without corroborating clinical evaluation may not be very accurate. However, the GDS is a validated instrument for assessing depressive symptoms and is used widely [ 38 , 40 , 41 , 48 , 70 ]. Third, it is unknown whether these findings are generalizable beyond the Yangon and Bago regions of Myanmar.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For these questions, the possible responses were: 1. none; 2. spouse; 3. children living with them; 4. children or relatives living apart; 5. neighbor; 6. friend; and, 7. other. Based on their responses, participants were categorized as “having no social support” (i.e., answering with ‘none’) or “having social support” (answering with any of the choices between 2 and 7) [ 48 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The assessment based on self-report may have caused social desirability bias, resulting in misreporting of depressive symptoms. However, the GDS is a well validated instrument for assessing depressive symptoms and used widely in international research [43,[45][46][47]51,65]. Furthermore, reverse causality could have occurred because of the nature of the cross-sectional design and further longitudinal studies are required to resolve this issue.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Responses were dichotomized into presence or absence of each type of social support based on whether participants responded "none" or other than "none." Finally, participants were segregated on the basis of the presence or absence of all four dimensions of social support (Sasaki et al, 2019).…”
Section: Measured Itemsmentioning
confidence: 99%