The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.cor.2009.12.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pre-disaster investment decisions for strengthening a highway network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
104
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 215 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
104
0
Order By: Relevance
“…KP is one of the most widely studied and experimented discrete programming problems. It offers many practical applications in diverse areas, such as project selection [2], resource distribution [3], investment decision making [4] and network interdiction problem [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…KP is one of the most widely studied and experimented discrete programming problems. It offers many practical applications in diverse areas, such as project selection [2], resource distribution [3], investment decision making [4] and network interdiction problem [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Boland et al implemented a version of their model with "lazy" constraints but found that this did not improve performance for their model instances. Peeta et al (2010) address a pre-disaster planning problem that seeks to strengthen a highway network whose links are subject to random failures due to a disaster. Each link may be either operational or non-functional after the disaster.…”
Section: Information Revelationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chang (2003) develop a performance measure based on accessibility to evaluate the functionality of an urban transportation system in the aftermath of a disaster. Peeta et al (2010) study a shortest-path based model to decide which links to strengthen in a highway network that are subject to random failures.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%