2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2022.120364
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pre-commercial thinning in Norway spruce-birch mixed stands can provide abundant forage for ungulates without losing volume production

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We observed that, even when accounting for the same stand density, the stands with PCT prior to CT (PCT_CT_800 or 600) had higher individual tree growth compared to stands with no PCT prior to CT (CT_800 or 600). This means that in stands with CT with prior PCT, individual trees maintained their increased earlier growth obtained from PCT [40,41] in current stands (PCT_CT_800 or 600). Therefore, the positive growth effect of PCT was additive to the growth benefits of CT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…We observed that, even when accounting for the same stand density, the stands with PCT prior to CT (PCT_CT_800 or 600) had higher individual tree growth compared to stands with no PCT prior to CT (CT_800 or 600). This means that in stands with CT with prior PCT, individual trees maintained their increased earlier growth obtained from PCT [40,41] in current stands (PCT_CT_800 or 600). Therefore, the positive growth effect of PCT was additive to the growth benefits of CT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The experiment was established between 2013 and 2014 in planted Norway spruce stands with admixed naturally regenerated birch. The stands had previously been used to study different PCT strategies and their effect on forage production and stand development [41]. An early PCT was conducted when Norway spruce was 1-2 m and birch was 2-2.5 m tall.…”
Section: Field Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A mixed forest can also function as a shield against biological agents [62,63] and provide cultural ecosystem services [35]. Further, young Norway-spruce-birch mixtures can provide forage for ungulates without production loss of Norway spruce [41]. It is not possible to translate all ecosystem services into monetary values and it was also not possible to incorporate all these benefits into the simulation system, for example, the benefit of resistance to pathogens, storm damage, etc.…”
Section: Do Norway Spruce-birch Mixtures Lower the Yield And Economic...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mixed stands of conifers and broadleaves can be kept and managed without necessarily suffering economically compared to monocultures (Dahlgren Lidman et al, 2021;Ara et al, 2022b). This admixture could also be a good way of maintaining a good amount of forage for ungulates, reducing browsing pressure on crop trees (Ara et al, 2022c). However, the MSP method must be chosen according to the desired amount of natural regeneration that should compose the future forest, and the levels of effort and cost that will be reasonable for future management (Ahtikoski et al, 2010;Uotila et al, 2010).…”
Section: Site Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, most of the natural regeneration consisted of deciduous trees, predominantly birch, which can be utilized to meet certification requirements and create mixed forest (Nilsson et al, 2006). Secondly, managing for mixtures of Norway spruce and birch can be advantageous in terms of flexibility (Dahlgren Lidman et al, 2021), forage production (Ara et al, 2022c), and creation of a larger variety of microhabitats in the future stand which can enhance biodiversity (Felton et al, 2010). Site preparation should therefore be chosen to meet multiple goals while also being well-suited to the site properties.…”
Section: Natural Regenerationmentioning
confidence: 99%