2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41561-021-00746-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pre-collisional extension of microcontinental terranes by a subduction pulley

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When approaching the YT, the CP was very young (G. Zhang et al., 2020) and easier to be stretched. In addition, forward geodynamic numerical experiments show that significant pre‐collisional extension of a microcontinental terrane could occur before it collides with a trench, ascribed to pull of the subducted slab (Gün et al., 2021). Furthermore, we reinterpreted two multichannel seismic transects collected from Z. Zhang, Dong, Sun, & Zhang (2021) and found detachment faults formed in the horst and graben structure zone (Figure S18 in Supporting Information ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When approaching the YT, the CP was very young (G. Zhang et al., 2020) and easier to be stretched. In addition, forward geodynamic numerical experiments show that significant pre‐collisional extension of a microcontinental terrane could occur before it collides with a trench, ascribed to pull of the subducted slab (Gün et al., 2021). Furthermore, we reinterpreted two multichannel seismic transects collected from Z. Zhang, Dong, Sun, & Zhang (2021) and found detachment faults formed in the horst and graben structure zone (Figure S18 in Supporting Information ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2.2–2.0 Ga, whereas several contemporaneous, extension‐related A‐type granitoids and mafic dykes have been reported in the central portion of the craton (Figure 14). Recent researchers suggest that prior to continent‐continent collision, significant extension occurred in the upper plate during Andean‐type subduction along the cratonal margin (e.g., Gün et al., 2021). Also, the major oxide, trace element, and isotope geochemical compositions of the A‐type granitoids suggest that they were associated with differentiation of contemporaneous mafic rocks (J. Liu et al., 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subduction of the outermost margin (i.e., continent–ocean transition zone), including the MSN rocks, started in the late Cambrian, while the more proximal LSN rocks approached the subduction zone. The LSN rocks undergo a substantial extension before their collision with the upper plate, owing to pull from the trenchward part of the subducting plate (Gün et al, 2021). In this scenario, extension of the lower plate could cause decompression melting of the deeper crustal levels, that is, in the crystalline basement beneath the sedimentary basin of the LSN (Li et al, 2021), and provoke the emplacement of the leucocratic orthogneiss protolith into the LSN.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this scenario, extension of the lower plate could cause decompression melting of the deeper crustal levels, that is, in the crystalline basement beneath the sedimentary basin of the LSN (Li et al, 2021), and provoke the emplacement of the leucocratic orthogneiss protolith into the LSN. The focus of the extension on the continental lithosphere embedded within the oceanic lithosphere might be due to the rheology and thickness differences between the oceanic and continental crust as demonstrated by Gün et al (2021). As subduction proceeded, the rocks of the LSN were introduced into the subduction zone and reached peak conditions before being exhumed and overthrusted by the MSN.…”
Section: Geodynamic Significance Of the Lsn Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%