2016
DOI: 10.1186/s13550-016-0238-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pre-clinical quantitative imaging and mouse-specific dosimetry for 111In-labelled radiotracers

Abstract: BackgroundAccurate quantification in molecular imaging is essential to improve the assessment of novel drugs and compare the radiobiological effects of therapeutic agents prior to in-human studies. The aim of this study was to investigate the challenges and feasibility of pre-clinical quantitative imaging and mouse-specific dosimetry of 111In-labelled radiotracers.Attenuation, scatter and partial volume effects were studied using phantom experiments, and an activity calibration curve was obtained for varying s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Denis-Bacelar et al compared microSPECT imaging and organ harvesting for the calculation of %IA/g in subcutaneous tumors after the injection of 111 In-labeled monoclonal antibodies [23]. They obtained a median %IA/g difference of about 30% between the two methods, resulting from discrepancies in the calculation of both tumor masses and activity concentrations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Denis-Bacelar et al compared microSPECT imaging and organ harvesting for the calculation of %IA/g in subcutaneous tumors after the injection of 111 In-labeled monoclonal antibodies [23]. They obtained a median %IA/g difference of about 30% between the two methods, resulting from discrepancies in the calculation of both tumor masses and activity concentrations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They obtained a median %IA/g difference of about 30% between the two methods, resulting from discrepancies in the calculation of both tumor masses and activity concentrations. However, %IA/g was calculated from single time-points only, rather than from longitudinal imaging and biodistribution data [23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to SPECT image-related factors, the accuracy of SPECT-based activity quantification can also be affected by other factors such as delineation of the volume of interest (VOI), activity calibration and post-reconstruction filtration. These aspects should also be considered carefully in the design and reporting of small-animal quantitative SPECT studies [ 13 , 14 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…use of image denoising lters), etc. ; so these aspects should also be considered carefully in the design and reporting of small-animal quantitative SPECT studies [12,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%