2016
DOI: 10.1051/epjap/2016150538
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pre-breakdown phase of coplanar dielectric barrier discharge in helium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the case of corona discharges, the similar contributions of Laan et al [70] or Petit et al [71] can be mentioned. We believe that the enhanced methodology of current measurements presented in this paper can contribute significantly to the recently-reported special cases of the discharging phenomena in extremely weak prebreakdown phases, whether at the dielectric surface [14,31,32] or in the volume [27,29,30].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For the case of corona discharges, the similar contributions of Laan et al [70] or Petit et al [71] can be mentioned. We believe that the enhanced methodology of current measurements presented in this paper can contribute significantly to the recently-reported special cases of the discharging phenomena in extremely weak prebreakdown phases, whether at the dielectric surface [14,31,32] or in the volume [27,29,30].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Typically, in order to study the microdischarge current development the required resolution of the current probe has to go to sub-ns times and μA. Moreover, a low current discharging phenomenon was observed recently during the prebreakdown phases of surface and volume barrier discharges [14,27,[29][30][31][32], which is hard to study without the necessary dynamical range in the current probing system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As indicated by Hudson and Loeb, and briefly discussed in section 2, the need for more correct terminology regarding the breakdown phenomena emerged more than a half century ago [14]: 'Some common misunderstandings can be avoided if a careful distinction is made between the terms breakdown and spark breakdown.' Unfortunately, in the recent literature not only the spark breakdown but many other not well defined terms as low and high pressure breakdowns [269], pre-Townsend [270] and Townsend breakdowns [271], streamer and leader downs [272], partial [273] and corona breakdowns [274], and streamer-like breakdowns [275] are used just within the relatively narrow topic of our review. Nevertheless, since in the technical literature the term 'electric breakdown' usually means the process of plasma production in an external electric field, [276], as already suggested in the Introduction, the simplest way to avoid of such complex and confusing terminology is to apply the term 'electric breakdown' as a synonym for all types self-sustained gas discharges, where the gaseous insulation breaks down and an electric current flows the gap.…”
Section: Conclusion and Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental setups able to resolve the short timescale of the pre-breakdown phase are uncommon. In one case based on a different geometrical setup [65], the co-planar DBD in argon was observed by using high-speed camera imaging, which has limited resolution in time. This suggests that the numerical approach presented in this research might be used to resolve the details of the pre-breakdown state of a gaseous discharge, not presently detectable experimentally.…”
Section: Onset Phasementioning
confidence: 99%