2019
DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/ab4cf8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pre- and post-selection paradoxes in quantum walks

Abstract: Many features of single-partite quantum walks can be simulated by classical waves. However, it was recently experimentally shown that some temporal sequences of measurements on a quantum walker do not admit a classical description in terms of macro-realistic theories. Here, we extend this observation and present pre-and post-selection scenarios in quantum walks leading to logical paradoxes. Such paradoxes were recently shown to be equivalent to proofs of contextuality, therefore we provide an additional argume… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Paradox Pre-and post-selection can lead to paradoxes [19], such as the three-box one [20]. In our case the paradox originates from the following counterfactual reasoning [16]. Imagine that at time t = 0 the system was pre-selected in the state |pre(0) and at time t = 2 it was post-selected in the state |post(2) .…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Paradox Pre-and post-selection can lead to paradoxes [19], such as the three-box one [20]. In our case the paradox originates from the following counterfactual reasoning [16]. Imagine that at time t = 0 the system was pre-selected in the state |pre(0) and at time t = 2 it was post-selected in the state |post(2) .…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…We do this by designing a Bell-like inequality [12] and showing that experimentally obtained measurement data violates it. The inequality is based on a recent logical pre-and post-selection (LPPS) paradox designed by some of the authors [16]. Notice that LPPS paradoxes were shown to be proofs of contextuality [17,18], hence if some system admits such a paradox, it is nonclassical in a sense that it is contextual [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both cases are quite different to what we discussed in the previous section. The latter case, in particular, has also been discussed in the context of several quantum paradoxes (e.g., the Quantum Cheshire Cat and the Quantum violations of the pigeonhole principle [88][89][90]), dealt with by the technique known as pre-and post-selections [91]. Clearly, the importance of temporal nonlocality is not limited to quantum physical systems and the idea that the "flow" of time is the result of correlations between "subsequent" moments of time which are entangled (or correlated) in non-local manner has been re-surging in different forms on many different occasions (e.g., [5,83,92,93] and references therein).…”
Section: Nonlocality In Timementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quantum walks are also very useful to build quantum algorithms [5][6][7][8], and a comparison with the corresponding classical random walks is crucial to assess the possible quantum enhancement due to the faster spreading of probability distributions. As a consequence, the differences between a classical and a quantum walk have been analyzed quite extensively, with short-and long-time behavior studied in both scenarios [9][10][11][12][13][14]. Signatures of the nonclassicality of the evolution involve the ballistic propagation of the quantum walker, compared to the classical diffusive analog [15], and their measurement-induced disturbance or the presence of nonclassical correlations, i.e., discord, in bipartite systems [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%