1988
DOI: 10.1007/bf01655682
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pre‐ and intraoperative localization of insulinomas: Report of 22 observations

Abstract: From a retrospective analysis of 22 cases of pancreatic insulinoma operated in our center, we have determined the predictive value of various pre‐ and intraoperative localization procedures. In 18 patients, solitary insulinomas were localized by selective arteriography (SA) in 55.5% of cases, by transhepatic catheterization with pancreatic venous sampling (THVS) in 64% of cases, but by ultrasonography (US) and computed tomography (CT) in only 11% of cases. The combination of SA and THVS allowed the preoperativ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
25
2
3

Year Published

1991
1991
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(41 reference statements)
2
25
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…More recently, promising results were reported with selective intraarterial injection of calcium (5) and methylene blue (6). Noninvasive methods (US and CT) have a low sensitivity (0-73%) (2,7-15), whereas invasive methods (angiography, THVS) are more accurate (52400%) but are expensive and time-consuming and require an experienced radiologist (2,9,10,(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18). Since the introduction of intraoperative ultrasonography (IOUS) (19), nearly 90% of insulinomas can be localized at surgery in experienced centers, but surgery is still facilitated by preoperative localization (9)(10)(11)(12)(13)17,(20)(21)(22).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, promising results were reported with selective intraarterial injection of calcium (5) and methylene blue (6). Noninvasive methods (US and CT) have a low sensitivity (0-73%) (2,7-15), whereas invasive methods (angiography, THVS) are more accurate (52400%) but are expensive and time-consuming and require an experienced radiologist (2,9,10,(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18). Since the introduction of intraoperative ultrasonography (IOUS) (19), nearly 90% of insulinomas can be localized at surgery in experienced centers, but surgery is still facilitated by preoperative localization (9)(10)(11)(12)(13)17,(20)(21)(22).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These inconsistent results have prompted the development of a more sensitive localization method, such as percutaneous portal vein insulin sampling (PVS) [11]. However, this technique requires special skills and experience, which are difficult to achieve because insulinomas are rare, with an incidence of only one to four per 1 million person-years [12][13][14][15]. Reports on dynamic CT and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have seemed promising [16][17][18].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…False-negative diagnoses may occur due to inadequate equipment, incorrect execution, movement artifacts, and poor tumoral vascularization. False-positive diagnoses are also possible [7,31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Angiography, however, is thought to be the most effective preoperative method to localize multiple small insulinomas [7,19]. The detection rates reported in the recent literature vary from 41% (18) to 89% (8).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation