2003
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-663-01609-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Praxis der Montagetechnik

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second approach uses human performance consequences such as the mental workload and the skill degradation (Parasuraman, Sheridan, and Wickens 2000) in addition to automation reliability and the costs of decision and action outcomes. A third approach is the decision graph based on seven questions about the planned production, the product and the assembly operations (Konold and Reger 2003). The answers to these questions lead to four decision options: manual, automatic or one of two hybrid systems.…”
Section: Current Research On Loa Decision-makingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second approach uses human performance consequences such as the mental workload and the skill degradation (Parasuraman, Sheridan, and Wickens 2000) in addition to automation reliability and the costs of decision and action outcomes. A third approach is the decision graph based on seven questions about the planned production, the product and the assembly operations (Konold and Reger 2003). The answers to these questions lead to four decision options: manual, automatic or one of two hybrid systems.…”
Section: Current Research On Loa Decision-makingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It will not be in focus here but is based on the knowledge of the assembly processes and technology and the "Product Analysis". Concepts and design guidelines can be found in literature [5,6,7].…”
Section: Evaluation and Classification Of Key Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To determine the maximum/ minimum deviation of the tolerance chain, the chain's links with their maximum/ minimum tolerances are added. [8] maximum of the tolarance chain minimum of the tolarance chain maximum tolarance of the component i minimum tolarance of the component i number of components within the assembly When a mounting capability is given by this maximum/minimum method, a complete replacement of the individual components is possible and the assembly will always be successful [7]. Assuming, however, that the existence of individual tolerances is random, and that they do not represent a specific trend or a systematic error within the assembly process, a worst-case scenario would lead to unnecessary costs and complexity.…”
Section: Fig 3 Tolerance Chain For An Aircraft Fuselage Section Assmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In case of a changeover, the system can be adjusted quickly to the new part geometry. But due to large processing times, average feeding rates are relatively low with 30 to 60 parts per minute [5,6].…”
Section: Orientation With Image Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%