2001
DOI: 10.1016/s1062-1458(00)00169-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pravastatin therapy and the risk of stroke

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
15
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We assumed that patients who had a stroke or CHD event started statins immediately after the event occurred, which is consistent with clinical practice. 25,27,28 In other words, once L CHD = 1 or L S = 1, the action I was taken.…”
Section: Treatment Decisionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We assumed that patients who had a stroke or CHD event started statins immediately after the event occurred, which is consistent with clinical practice. 25,27,28 In other words, once L CHD = 1 or L S = 1, the action I was taken.…”
Section: Treatment Decisionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been shown that high concentrations of low‐density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol increase the risk of ischemic stroke, 2–4 whereas high concentrations of high‐density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol possibly decrease the risk of ischemic stroke, particularly small vessel stroke 2,5 . Furthermore, large‐scale randomized clinical trials have revealed that lowering cholesterol concentrations with statins reduces the risk of ischemic and overall stroke, 6–8 despite an increase in hemorrhagic stroke 8 . However, given high phenotypic and genetic correlation across different lipids and apolipoproteins, 9 it remains unclear whether one or more lipid‐related entities account for the observed associations between lipids and stroke.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus he examines a NEJM article that claimed a 19 percent reduction in stroke risk in a population that took the statin Pravachol, compared to those who had been given a placebo. 19 However, as Abramson reminds us, the percent advantage represents the relative risk, but what matters is the absolute risk. This difference between relative and absolute risk is illustrated in Moynihan and Cassels's Selling Sickness, where they report a presentation given by a University of British Columbia therapeutics team, James McCormack and Bob Rango.…”
Section: Reexamining the Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%