Knowledge in Action 2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-658-18337-0_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Präsentationales Wissen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As more or less robust manifestations of expert knowledge, these and other forms of evidence tend to be regarded as collectively held and hardly questionable body of facts" (Strassheim and Korinek 2016, p. 116). Since facts do not speak for themselves but need to be made evident (Wilke et al 2018), members of epistemic communities stage this knowledge in expert briefings or try to reach out through broadcasted press conferences (Beck 2012; Hajer 2012). Thus, type one objects fit neatly into a conventional narrative of evidence-based policy, since it suggests a consensual knowledge base that ends epistemic uncertainty (Haas 2004;Esguerra 2015).…”
Section: Type One: Securing the Presentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As more or less robust manifestations of expert knowledge, these and other forms of evidence tend to be regarded as collectively held and hardly questionable body of facts" (Strassheim and Korinek 2016, p. 116). Since facts do not speak for themselves but need to be made evident (Wilke et al 2018), members of epistemic communities stage this knowledge in expert briefings or try to reach out through broadcasted press conferences (Beck 2012; Hajer 2012). Thus, type one objects fit neatly into a conventional narrative of evidence-based policy, since it suggests a consensual knowledge base that ends epistemic uncertainty (Haas 2004;Esguerra 2015).…”
Section: Type One: Securing the Presentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To deepen our understanding of such processes, we turn to embodied communicative processes and focus on the understudied area of visuals in inter-and transdisciplinary science communication. We discuss some findings of two different research projects, supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG), on transdisciplinary science communication (Hill, 2016(Hill, , 2017 and interdisciplinary communication in science (Lettkemann & Wilke, 2016;Wilke, Lettkemann, & Knoblauch, 2018). Both terms refer to the communication (and partly intersubjective validation) of scientific knowledge.…”
Section: Methodological Approach: Combining Videography and Focused Ethnographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We share the major assumptions of communicative constructivism within this empirical-theoretical framework. Our research projects focus on the empirical modes of interand transdisciplinary science communication within the frame of scientific knowledge production (Bechtel, 2004), (re-)presentation (Alać, 2008) and communication (Lettkemann, Wilke, & Knoblauch, 2018). We have found that both these spheres are tremendously shaped by new communication practices and technologies of visualization.…”
Section: The Communicative Construction Of New Forms Of Science Communicationmentioning
confidence: 99%