Präoperatives Gallengangstenting

Bodner, J.; Bodner, E.

doi:10.1159/000012468

Cited by 4 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 12 publications

(13 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The size of the lesion may vary from a small papule to a massive enlargement which does not typically exceed a diameter of 2 cm [3,9]. However, lesions larger than 5 cm have also been reported, and their growth have been linked to factors such 2 as poor oral hygiene and xerostomia [3,10]. In some cases, progressive growth may lead to significant tumors that compromise speech, chewing, or swallowing, with evolution time ranging from three months to four years [3].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Pregnancy-Associated Peripheral Giant Cell Granuloma: A Case Report

Alcaraz Baturoni,

Zepeda Nuño,

Nolasco González

et al. 2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Peripheral giant cell granuloma (PGCG) is an asymptomatic, non-neoplastic and proliferative lesion of unknown etiology. Some possible pre-disposing factors such as hormonal changes dur-ing pregnancy, have been suggested. However, the association between PGCG and pregnancy is controversial. There are few reported clinical cases of pregnancy-associated PGCG in the litera-ture, and they occurred only in the lower jaw. The present report is on a 35-year-old female pa-tient at 36 weeks of gestation who presented with a PGCG in the central and lateral incisors of the upper jaw. The management consisted of surgical excision, along with curettage of the affected bony walls. The diagnosis was based on clinical results and imaging examinations, and it was histopathologically confirmed. The patient underwent postoperative follow-up evaluations at 3, 6 and 12 months, and there were no signs of recurrence.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Pregnancy-Associated Peripheral Giant Cell Granuloma: A Case Report

Alcaraz Baturoni,

Zepeda Nuño,

Nolasco González

et al. 2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…10−14 When students identify that their judgments cause bias, conceptual conflict occurs between positivist beliefs and experiences supporting constructivist epistemology. 15,16 The conflict has the potential to change students' views about the nature of scientific reasoning.…”

Section: ■ Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“It’s Fundamental”: Quantum Dot Blinking Experiment to Teach Critical Thinking

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Analysis of stochastic processes can be used to engender critical thinking. Quantum dots have a reversible, stochastic transition between luminescent and non-luminescent states. The luminescence intermittency is known as blinking, and is not evident from ensemble measurements. In order to stimulate critical thinking, students design, perform, and analyze a semiconductor quantum dot blinking laboratory experiment. The design of the experiment and stochastic nature of the data collected require students to make judgements throughout the course of the single-particle measurement and analysis. Some of the decisions do not have uniquely correct answers, challenging the students to engage in critical thinking. We propose that students' self-examined decision making develops a constructivist view of science. The experiment is visually striking, interdisciplinary, and develops higher order thinking.

show abstract