Pram mobilities: affordances and atmospheres that assemble childhood and motherhood on-the-move

Clement, Susannah; Waitt, Gordon R

doi:10.1080/14733285.2018.1432849

Cited by 48 publications

(36 citation statements)

References 46 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…More recently, there has been a shift to conceptualising care as a sociomaterial practice that takes place in conjunction with things in the city such as pavements (Kullman, ), strollers (Clement & Waitt, , ), cars (Waitt & Harada, ), housing (Power, ; Power & Mee, 2019), and buildings (Bates, Imrie, & Kullman, ). We classify materialities of care research as a research that examines how objects, bodies, buildings, or materials are enrolled and how they shape the nature and possibility of care.…”

Section: Care and The Citymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Such research can cross‐fertilise earlier feminist interest in how women's parenting responsibilities are shaped by urban design and transport (Dowling, ) with new ways of conceptualising embodied mobilities and materialities. Inspiration might be drawn from Clement and Waitt (, ), Waitt and Harada (), and Kullman () who uncover the sociomaterial relations of mobile urban care. Waitt and Harada (), for instance, describe how the culturally privatised space of the family car enables parenting.…”

Section: Toward a New Urban Geographical Theory Of Urban Caringmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Cities of care: A platform for urban geographical care research

Power

Williams

2019

Geography Compass

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper develops an agenda for a broadened conceptualisation of urban caring within geographical research. We open by identifying three existing domains of urban care research: examining spaces of care, materialities of care, and asking who are the subjects of care? We then synthesise three platforms that can be the foundation of a geographical theory and approach to urban care. Drawing from feminist care research and recent keystone pieces on urban caring, we argue, first, that there is a need for a broadened conceptualisation of urban care that emphasises the universal need for care and care that supports human and non-human flourishing. Second, we propose an expanded scale of urban care analysis that attends to the ways that lives are lived within and through the city. Third, we open up an analysis of where care is located in cities,arguing for the value of locating urban care beyond interpersonal care and care through welfare, to urban governance and planning, markets, and more-than-human materialities. We conclude by conceptualising how care might inform utopian dreamings for the just and caring city.We challenge urban geographers to think through the possibilities of care to transform cities. K E Y W O R D Scare, care policy, justice, markets, materiality, spaces of care, urban geography

show abstract

Section: Care and The Citymentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Toward a New Urban Geographical Theory Of Urban Caringmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cities of care: A platform for urban geographical care research

Power

Williams

2019

Geography Compass

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This means that human designs and activities, and in this case care, develop through engagements with actors that are always more‐than‐human and are shaped through the creative presence of these actors. These might be tangible material objects and places, for example, the prams, cars, and drop‐in centres that have been the focus of recent care research (Clement & Waitt, , ; Conradson, ; Waitt & Harada, ), or less tangible or immaterial entities, atmospheres, policy frameworks (Bear, ; McFarlane, ; Swyngedouw, ), place‐based affects (Kraftl & Adey, ), and so on, that are productive of a sense of care. They may be spatially and temporally co‐present, or located in different timespaces, as expanded below.…”

Section: Assembling the Capacity To Care In Unequal Worldsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assembling the capacity to care: Caring‐with precarious housing

Power

2019

Trans Inst British Geog

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In a period when care is being cast as an individual responsibility there is a need to invigorate analyses of caring capacity, of the factors and relations that make care possible. This paper develops caring-with as an analytic to guide analyses of caring capacity. Caring-with brings feminist care ethics together with assemblage thinking. It innovates from Tronto's identification of "caring with" as the fifth phase of care to figure care as a generative sociomaterial relation that is productive of and emergent through assemblages of actors who are not always supportive of care. Caring-with advances three frames for conceptualising caring capacity. First, caring-with situates care in a sociomaterial and performative frame.Second, it places care in a temporal frame, speaking to the historical and generative depth of relations that are the foundation and future of care. Third, it theorises the production and translation of care across space. These concepts are empirically examined through the caring experiences of single older women living in precarious housing in Sydney, Australia. Interviews with these women show how housing assemblages shape the emergent potential for care, co-constituting the capacity for individuals to take part in caring practices (for self and others) and to achieve basic care needs (including needs for food, energy, and appropriate housing). Caring-with provides a framework for conceptualising caring capacity in unequal worlds and illuminates the adaptive and creative agencies that generate and hold care together. It also points to new ways of conceptualising caring responsibility as a distributed achievement. Finally, caring-with suggests an approach to conceptualising housing within care research.

show abstract

“…Inspired, in particular, by themes from phenomenology (Merleau-Ponty 1962, 1968, Heidegger 1992, this article brings concepts such as skinship (Tahan 2010), interembodiment (Lupton 2013) and affective atmospheres (Anderson 2009) into conversation with recent literatures on family practices (Hall and Holdsworth 2016;Valentine 2008) and the importance of design and materiality for mobilities (Jensen 2016, Jensen 2017). In particular, I take inspiration from the new focus on infant geographies (Holt 2013) and the mobility experiences of new parents and babies (Boyer and Spinney 2016;Clement and Waitt 2018). The article makes the following contributions:…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Baby on board: the impact of sling use on experiences of family mobility with babies and young children

Whittle

2018

Mobilities

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Today many parents in the UK are choosing to carry their children in slings. Despite this, there has been no research on how babywearing might change families' experiences of journey-making. Based on interviews with parents in the North of England, this paper uses literatures on affects and mobilities design to contribute to a growing range of studies on infant mobilities. In doing so, it extends our understanding of the importance of relationality in family mobility practices and highlights the importance of understanding the dynamism of mobility during early family life.

show abstract

Pram mobilities: affordances and atmospheres that assemble childhood and motherhood on-the-move

Cited by 48 publications

References 46 publications

Cities of care: A platform for urban geographical care research

Cities of care: A platform for urban geographical care research

Assembling the capacity to care: Caring‐with precarious housing

Baby on board: the impact of sling use on experiences of family mobility with babies and young children

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About