2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.04.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pragmatism, connectionism and the internet: A mind’s perfect storm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The key idea was that Web 2.0 tools have a number of affordances that transform the learning context by providing multiple opportunities for shared content and resources, self-directed learning, collaborative learning, ubiquitous and lifelong learning (Clark et al, 2009;Ravenscroft, 2009;McLoughlin & Lee, 2010;Glassman & Kang, 2010). Because of its read/write nature, Web 2.0 offers new learning environments based upon the user-centred, participative and social networking characteristics embedded.…”
Section: Defining Educational Web 20mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The key idea was that Web 2.0 tools have a number of affordances that transform the learning context by providing multiple opportunities for shared content and resources, self-directed learning, collaborative learning, ubiquitous and lifelong learning (Clark et al, 2009;Ravenscroft, 2009;McLoughlin & Lee, 2010;Glassman & Kang, 2010). Because of its read/write nature, Web 2.0 offers new learning environments based upon the user-centred, participative and social networking characteristics embedded.…”
Section: Defining Educational Web 20mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current views and perceptions of learning determine the way that educational Web 2.0 has driven pedagogy so that teachers need to know, not only how to use the Web 2.0 tools for personal purposes but how to use them to support and enhance their students' learning. The use of Web 2.0 is expected to exert a significant impact on instruction and learning since it provides multiple opportunities for students' engagement, communication, active and self-directed learning, while it offers shared content and resources and promotes collaborative learning (Dede, 2008;McLoughlin & Lee, 2010;Glassman & Kang, 2010). In addition, Web 2.0 technologies extend students' learning spaces (both physical and virtual) beyond the walls of the classroom, while they can bridge learning and instruction spaces across school, home, and the wider community (Jimoyiannis, 2010b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Internet-based, hypertext-capable tools such as blogs and wikis offer the opportunity for non-linear, simultaneous interrelationships between information sources that makes Pragmatic education more possible. Internet tools offer a systematic approach that recognizes the role of certainty, but emphasizes the value in ways that might better reflect both the cultural development of human thinking and the way in which the human mind works (Glassman & Kang, 2010). …”
Section: The Certainty-value Continuum In Educationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Positing of major premises and teaching deductive strategies for general problem solving became a more important focus of practices, research and policy in education. 10 Even though a strong argument can be made that abduction is both more natural to the way humans think when attempting to adapt to new environments/ ecologies (Glassman and Kang 2010), and more important to human progress and problem solving, abduction has fallen by the wayside because the right technology just did not exist to cultivate this logic in the classroom. Dewey's idea of small problem-solving groups was too open to pitfalls (inability to promote multiple premises simultaneously, time and space constraints, distance from everyday social and societal expectations).…”
Section: The Certainty-value Continuum In Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…İnternet öz-yeterliğine sahip bireyler araştırma yapmaya istek duymakta ve hızla gelişen internet uygulamalarını da kullanarak problemlerini çözebilmektedir. İnternet öz-yeterliği, yeni iletişim imkânlarını kullanabilmekten, internette belirli amaca hizmet eden topluluklara katılabilmeye, benzer grupları oluşturabilmeye ve teknik bir takım sorunlara çözüm üretebilmeye kadar pek çok alan üzerinden değerlendirilebilmektedir (Glassman ve Kang, 2010). …”
Section: Introductionunclassified