2018
DOI: 10.1183/13993003.00315-2018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pragmatic tuberculosis prevention policies for primary care in low- and middle-income countries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several randomised controlled trials assessing the impact of more complex mobile phone interventions on TB cure rates and preventive treatment adherence rates are ongoing and will contribute to this evidence . Such interventions may have more success in improving preventive treatment adherence rates as, in contrast to TB treatment, this is typically self‐administered and is an area in need of significant improvement .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several randomised controlled trials assessing the impact of more complex mobile phone interventions on TB cure rates and preventive treatment adherence rates are ongoing and will contribute to this evidence . Such interventions may have more success in improving preventive treatment adherence rates as, in contrast to TB treatment, this is typically self‐administered and is an area in need of significant improvement .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…individual contacts at high risk of tuberculosis, it identified households in which contacts are at high risk of tuberculosis that could then be prioritised for comprehensive, household-level interventions. 15 Furthermore, because tuberculosis is a disease that clusters in households, a household-level risk score might be a more effective method of prioritising resources to maximise epidemiological impact. In this much larger study, we used data on index patient, household, and contact characteristics to derive and externally validate such a score.…”
Section: Implications Of All the Available Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This individual score, which includes clinical and sociodemographic risk factors, predicts tuberculosis independently of baseline latent tuberculosis infection status and is being evaluated within the ongoing Community Randomised Evaluation of a Socioeconomic Intervention to Prevent Tuberculosis trial to facilitate targeted tuberculosis screening and preventive treatment 12, 13, 14. However, our experiences during that trial suggest that a score might be of greater pragmatic value to public health programmes if, rather than identifying individual contacts at high risk of tuberculosis, it identified households in which contacts are at high risk of tuberculosis that could then be prioritised for comprehensive, household-level interventions 15 . Furthermore, because tuberculosis is a disease that clusters in households, a household-level risk score might be a more effective method of prioritising resources to maximise epidemiological impact.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TB is a communicable disease and a major cause of ill health globally that affects the lungs (pulmonary) but can also affect other sites (extrapulmonary) [19,20]. Despite being a curable and preventable disease, TB is the leading cause of death from bacterial infection worldwide and undoubtedly representing a global public health priority [21][22][23][24]. TB is also the leading cause of morbidity and mortality among people living with HIV/AIDS [24], accounting for approximately 40% of deaths globally [20].…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%