Pragmatic thought as a philosophical foundation for collaborative tagging and the Semantic Web

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to use ideas drawn from two founders of American pragmatism, William James and Charles Sanders Peirce, in order to propose a philosophical foundation that supports the value of collaborative tagging and reinforces the structure and goals of the Semantic Web. Design/methodology/approach The study employs a close analysis of key literature by James and Peirce to answer recent calls for a philosophy of the Web and to respond to research in the LIS literature that has assessed the value and limitations of folksonomy. Moreover, pragmatic views are applied to illustrate the relationships among collaborative tagging, linked data, and the Semantic Web. Findings With a philosophical foundation in place, the study highlights the value of the minority tags that fall within the so-called “long tail” of the power law graph, and the importance of granting sufficient time for the full value of folksonomy to be revealed. The discussion goes further to explore how “collaborative tagging” could evolve into “collaborative knowledge” in the form of linked data. Specifically, Peirce’s triadic architectonic is shown to foster an understanding of the construction of linked data through the functional requirements for bibliographic records entity-relation model and resource description framework triples, and James’s image of the multiverse anticipates the goals Tim Berners-Lee has articulated for the Semantic Web. Originality/value This study is unique in using Jamesian and Peircean thinking to argue for the value of folksonomy and to suggest implications for the Semantic Web.

The effect of multilingual suggested tags on cross-language information tagging behaviour

“…STs contain useful information about a user's choice of tagging objects, tagging perspective and tag presentation, which makes users choose to follow and imitate (Oliveira et al, 2008). It showed that the STs caused users to create tags that were semantically related (Bruhn and Syn, 2018). Cattuto et al (2007) proved that behind the fact of semantic relations, similar tagging behaviour was shared, although the differences did exist in a user's information goals and tag choices.…”

Semantic enrichment on large scanned collections through their “satellite texts”: the paradigm of Migne’s Patrologia Graeca

“…As PG falls into the category of unstructured image data, the annotation process (tagging) on scanned pages would be more a suitable option (Zeng, 2019). The annotation greatly assists in the discovery of information since tags represent the main concepts on each textual image (Bruhn and Syn, 2018; Featherston et al , 2019; Minsky, 1982). The tagging can be provided in the form of keywords, free text or by using a predefined set of terms, taxonomies or ontologies (Dasiopoulou et al , 2011).…”