1999
DOI: 10.1006/brln.1999.2127
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pragmatic Assessment and Therapy for Persons with Brain Damage: What Have Clinicians Gleaned in Two Decades?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…An explanation might be that former studies did not propose a sensitive-enough assessment of communication, and particularly of conversational discourse. Conversational discourse is known to be particularly discriminating when it comes to pragmatics and assessment of RBD [33]. And indeed, one cluster is characterized by an almost exclusive impairment in this task.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An explanation might be that former studies did not propose a sensitive-enough assessment of communication, and particularly of conversational discourse. Conversational discourse is known to be particularly discriminating when it comes to pragmatics and assessment of RBD [33]. And indeed, one cluster is characterized by an almost exclusive impairment in this task.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, researchers have begun to find clues demonstrating that some tasks might be predictive of other abilities [50]. Meanwhile, the conversational discourse task could be analyzed by itself, as it contains all aspects of communication and seems particularly sensitive to RBD deficits [33]. Conversational discourse, described as a very rich and complex language task, would benefit from a more detailed analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the contrary, as I have argued elsewhere, I think it is because many of them are embedded in the WHO that they are insufficient (Penn, 1999(Penn, , 2000 because such a division creates artificial distinctions on a more synergistic understanding of language and its uses.…”
Section: University Of the Witwatersrand South Africamentioning
confidence: 92%
“…a distinct and autonomous cognitive system which is domain specific, fast, automatic and informationally encapsulated. Kasher In contrast to the modular approach, the 'interactionist' view sees pragmatics as a functional or interactional phenomenon (see, for example, discussion in Craig, 1995;McTear & Conti-Ramsden, 1992;Penn, 1999). Bates and MacWhinney's (1982) Competition Model sees pragmatics as a function of the interplay between the information value of a particular form or pattern and its processing cost.…”
Section: An Emergentist Account Of Pragmatic Ability and Disabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%