2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.trip.2019.100010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Practitioners' perspective on user experience and design of cycle highways

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the Netherlands, for instance, cycling planning strategies are becoming increasingly differentiated between city centres and their surrounding periphery. In the former, there is increasing talk of the need to slow down cyclists to avoid them becoming 'the new car' (Goossens 2017) while in the latter new intra-urban fast 'cycling highways' are being built (CROW 2014;Liu et al 2019), though not without contestation or resistance, as for some fast cycling does not belong in their neighbourhood (van Gool 2019). Rather than thinking of velotopian imaginaries as 'one size fits all', we should recognise that different imaginaries are likely to play out differently depending on geographic, institutional and sociocultural contexts (see Macmillan and Woodcock 2017;Pojani et al 2017).…”
Section: Discussion: Repoliticising Velotopian Imaginariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Netherlands, for instance, cycling planning strategies are becoming increasingly differentiated between city centres and their surrounding periphery. In the former, there is increasing talk of the need to slow down cyclists to avoid them becoming 'the new car' (Goossens 2017) while in the latter new intra-urban fast 'cycling highways' are being built (CROW 2014;Liu et al 2019), though not without contestation or resistance, as for some fast cycling does not belong in their neighbourhood (van Gool 2019). Rather than thinking of velotopian imaginaries as 'one size fits all', we should recognise that different imaginaries are likely to play out differently depending on geographic, institutional and sociocultural contexts (see Macmillan and Woodcock 2017;Pojani et al 2017).…”
Section: Discussion: Repoliticising Velotopian Imaginariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liu et al [18] have tested the users' point of view considering the opinion of practitioners from five European countries (the Netherlands, Belgium, Germany, United Kingdom, and Denmark) about the cycle highways. Their results show that, while practitioners are guided by infrastructural standards for cycle highways (such as width, design speed and intersection treatments), what is less clear is how these infrastructure elements fit within the surrounding environment to create desirable cycling experiences [18] (p. 2). In this regard, designers should consider a wide variety of user groups and their specific needs in the planning and design of cycle highways.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experiential elements, such as enjoyability, convenience, safety and attractiveness, are often mentioned in relation to physical design, along with concrete ideas, such as design speed, traffic separation, curves, traffic volume, and other measurable variables. The opinion showed in [18] has been very useful for the individuation of dyscrasias as defined in the following paragraphs, and the consideration of the different users' needs can be a very interesting focus in order to integrate good design to the goal of improving the experience for urban cyclists.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the scientific research examines the user experience and evaluates the effects from the introduction of bicycle highways [4][5][6][7][8][9]. These primarily include effects on bicycle share, demand induction, safety, health benefits, and user satisfaction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%