Practitioner Perspectives on Hypothesis Testing Strategies in the Context of Functional Behavior Assessment

Lloyd, Blair P.; Torelli, Jessica N.; Pollack, Marney S.

doi:10.1007/s10864-020-09384-4

Cited by 11 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 39 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Despite consensus on the value and importance of functional analysis (FA) to the assessment and treatment of challenging behavior (e.g., Hanley, 2012 ; Iwata & Dozier, 2008 ; Lloyd et al, 2021 ; Mace, 1994 ; Oliver et al, 2015 ; Roscoe et al, 2015 ), individuals who receive formal behavior interventions are unlikely to benefit from it because few practitioners qualified to conduct the analysis actually do so (Lloyd et al, 2021 ; Oliver et al, 2015 ; Roscoe et al, 2015 ). Reasons for lack of adoption vary but common concerns include ecological validity (e.g., Conroy et al, 1996 ) and resource constraints (Lloyd et al, 2021 ; Oliver et al, 2015 ). Additionally, the most commonly studied FA methodologies are session-based (Beavers et al, 2013 ; Hanley et al, 2003 ).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Partially Automated Training for Implementing, Summarizing, and Interpreting Trial-Based Functional Analyses

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Trial-based functional analysis (TBFA) is an accurate and ecologically valid assessment of challenging behavior. Further, there is evidence to suggest that individuals with minimal exposure to behavior analytic assessment methodology (e.g., parents, teachers) can quickly be trained to conduct TBFAs in naturalistic settings (e.g., schools, homes). Notwithstanding, the response effort associated with training development can be prohibitive and may preclude incorporation of TBFA into practice. To address this, we developed a partially automated training package, intended to increase the methodology’s accessibility. Using a multiple-probe across skills design, we assessed the degree to which the package increased caregiver accuracy in (a) implementing TBFAs, (b) interpreting TBFA outcomes, and (c) managing TBFA data. Six caregivers completed this study and all demonstrated proficiency following training, first during structured roleplays and again during assessment of their child’s actual challenging behavior.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Partially Automated Training for Implementing, Summarizing, and Interpreting Trial-Based Functional Analyses

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…There is clear consensus amongst both scientists and practitioners that functional analysis (FA)‐informed intensive treatments are the most likely to ethically and effectively address chronic and severe manifestations of challenging behavior (Jeong & Copeland, 2020; Lloyd et al, 2021). The term FA describes a range of experimental techniques that establish causal relations between challenging behavior and controlling variables (Hanley, 2012; Iwata & Dozier, 2008; Lambert & Houchins‐Juarez, 2020).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Description and evaluation of a function‐informed and mechanisms‐based framework for treating challenging behavior

Lambert¹,

Copeland²,

Paranczak³

et al. 2022

J of App Behav Analysis

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Individualization and iterative design are essential components of the assessment and treatment of challenging behavior. Currently, there are few validated frameworks for engaging in iterative processes. Due to the nature of single-case design, empirically rigorous evaluations of decision-tree processes are particularly prohibitive. Notwithstanding, evaluations are needed. In this paper we first describe a function-informed and mechanisms-based (FIMB) framework for selecting treatment components employed by a university-based practicum experience designed to expose pre-service practitioners to a valid treatment process for challenging behavior. Then, we share a completed retrospective consecutive case series across a 6-year period in which we conducted a technique analysis to identify which procedures were most commonly selected in the practicum, and the impact of those choices on client outcomes. The results suggest that the model can be highly effective for some, but not all, cases. Implications are discussed.

show abstract

“…The product of their cumulative efforts is a well-researched and validated method for reliably interpreting data from traditional (sessionbased) FA formats. However, application may be somewhat limited by the fact that FAs are not widely adopted by practitioners (e.g., Lloyd et al, 2020;Oliver et al, 2015;Roscoe et al, 2015). There is some evidence to suggest that this is due to concerns about the feasibility, safety, and ecological validity of traditional FA formats (e.g., Lloyd et al, 2020;Oliver et al, 2015;Roscoe et al, 2015;Thomason-Sassi et al, 2011).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Formative applications of ongoing visual inspection for trial‐based functional analysis: A proof of concept

Standish¹,

Bailey²,

Lambert³

et al. 2021

J of App Behav Analysis

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Trial-based functional analysis (TBFA) possesses many strategic advantages which make it an ideal candidate for adoption in applied settings. Notwithstanding, some aspects of the analysis remain underdeveloped, including structured guidelines for interacting with obtained data reliably in formative and summative ways. The purpose of this study was to adapt existing ongoing visual-inspection (OVI) criteria to match the idiosyncrasies of TBFA and then to assess their practical utility in applied settings. Thus, we first drafted OVI criteria appropriate for trial-based FA (i.e., TB-OVI). Then, we trained 5 caregivers to conduct TBFAs of their children's challenging behavior and to react to their data as they obtained it, using the TB-OVI criteria as their guide. Finally, we validated interpretations of TBFA outcomes based on TB-OVI criteria through effective intervention. Across 5 participants and 7 opportunities, function-based interventions successfully eliminated challenging behavior.

show abstract

Practitioner Perspectives on Hypothesis Testing Strategies in the Context of Functional Behavior Assessment

Cited by 11 publications

References 39 publications

Partially Automated Training for Implementing, Summarizing, and Interpreting Trial-Based Functional Analyses

Partially Automated Training for Implementing, Summarizing, and Interpreting Trial-Based Functional Analyses

Description and evaluation of a function‐informed and mechanisms‐based framework for treating challenging behavior

Formative applications of ongoing visual inspection for trial‐based functional analysis: A proof of concept

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About