Practitioner experience of the impact of humanistic methods on autism practice: a preliminary study

Abstract

Purpose Autistic people are subject to having their behaviour shaped from a variety of practitioners predominantly using behaviourist methodologies. Little is known about how learning alternative humanistic methodologies impacts practitioner experiences of relational encounters with autistic people. This paper aims to develop an understanding of practitioner experiences of using person-centred counselling (PCC) skills and contact reflections (CR) when engaging with autistic people. Design/methodology/approach This qualitative study used an interpretive approach to help elucidate perceptions of changing practice. It involved a framework analysis of 20 practitioner’s experiential case study accounts. Findings An overarching theme emerged: subtle transformations resulted from shifting practice paradigms. Four broad themes were identified: “A different way of being”; “Opening heightened channels of receptivity”; “Trust in self-actualising growth” and “Expanding relational ripples”. The findings suggest that PCC and CRs skills training shows promise in providing practitioners with a different way of being with autistic people that enhances their capacity towards neurotypical-neurodivergent intersubjectivity. Social implications The authors speculate on the power dynamics of care relationships and those who may identify as possessing autism expertise. The authors are curious as to whether this humanistic skills training can truly penetrate practitioner core values and see this as a fundamental issue which requires further investigation. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study to provide a qualitative account of autism practitioner reflections following training in humanistic methodologies. It challenges the concept of autism expertise, guided by a pathologiSing model, focused on fixing a problem located in the person, which conceals the removal of personhood.

Long-term ABA Therapy Is Abusive: A Response to Gorycki, Ruppel, and Zane

“…While there is no consensus in the scientific community on the validity of the neuro-diversity argument, no one has previously researched the catalyst for this outcry-ABA. We are not the first authors to emphasize the abusive nature of ABA therapy, and various others continue to identify this abuse and advocate for the termination of this abuse or for alternative treatments (Hungate, 2020;McGill and Robinson, 2020;Milton, 2020;Robinson et al, 2020;Wilkenfeld and McCarthy, 2020). Wilkenfeld and McCarthy (2020) demonstrated that ABA is unethical from a bioethics perspective.…”

Emotion transformation: a grounded theory for uncovering painful triggers and repairing relational connection for parents of autistic children

“…The unmet needs correspond to the individuals’ painful emotions predisposing autistic people to trauma-related experiences (Robinson, 2018). We advocate that a paradigm shift is necessary at the very earliest point of diagnosis to promote parent self-efficacy based upon acceptance and learning skills that support typical-neurodivergent intersubjectivity (Robinson et al , 2020).…”

Phenomenological considerations on empathy and emotions in psychotherapy

“…We should clarify that we are not claiming that maladaptive emotion schemes are the only possible disruptor of basic empathy. For example, Robinson et al (2021) suggested that difficulty with basic empathy can be due to a mismatch between neurotypical and neurodivergent forms of intersubjectivity. Nevertheless, we suggest that primary maladaptive emotion schemes are a common impeder of basic empathy.…”