2009
DOI: 10.1056/nejmp0901277
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Practicing Medicine in the Age of Facebook

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
83
0
9

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 163 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
83
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…[15][16][17] Students, residents, and faculty who engage in medical mission projects must be made aware that patient privacy must still be protected while providing care abroad and that they may be subjected to privacy laws that could be as stringent as the US Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). Third year/third-year resident, % Like other research exploring the utilization of SNAs by physicians-in-training, 6,8,18,19 our study found evidence of unprofessional behavior on Facebook. At the same time, there are numerous benefits to online social networks for medical professionals, including increased social capital and increased communication between doctors and possibly, even between doctors and patients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[15][16][17] Students, residents, and faculty who engage in medical mission projects must be made aware that patient privacy must still be protected while providing care abroad and that they may be subjected to privacy laws that could be as stringent as the US Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). Third year/third-year resident, % Like other research exploring the utilization of SNAs by physicians-in-training, 6,8,18,19 our study found evidence of unprofessional behavior on Facebook. At the same time, there are numerous benefits to online social networks for medical professionals, including increased social capital and increased communication between doctors and possibly, even between doctors and patients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…While there are advantages associated with instantaneous communication with an unlimited number of contacts, there are also consequences, anticipated or unintended, that extend from misjudgments, unprofessional behavior, or less-than-desirable portrayals of individuals [6][7][8] and privacy violations. 9 While many medical institutions have expressed concerns related to the use and misuse of social networking applications, only a minority have Methods Using the online social networking application Facebook, we evaluated social networking profiles for 2 cohorts of medical students (n 5 528) and residents (n 5 712) at the University of Florida in Gainesville.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…published case reports have described patient-doctor interactions within OSNs in the medical literature. [7][8][9]17 To our knowledge, this is the first attempt to quantify on a national level physician and medical student use of OSNs and patient interactions therein. Although the sample size was low and limits the generalizability of findings, it provides novel information about the use of OSNs by medical professionals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, several recent reports have described patient-doctor interactions within OSNs. [7][8][9] The ambiguous status of OSNs as they relate to medical interactions and the potential they present for altering fundamental aspects of the patient-doctor relationship have also prompted the formulation of proposed guidelines for physicians using OSNs. 10,11 Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11606-011-1761-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Risks highlighted in previous literature are based on unprofessional patient-physician contact [12] along with f "tweets" and "posts." Our presession surveys show that many residents witness unprofessional online content as reported in previous literature as well [4,13,14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%