Abstract:Arguments for social justice teacher education and arguments for practice-based teacher education are often seen as incongruous. Drawing on sociocultural theory and theories of justice, our study interrogates this underresearched assumption. We conducted video analyses of teacher education coursework and novice teachers’ K–6 classroom instruction, together with novices’ written reflections on videos. Data were collected during a university-based, accelerated teacher credentialing program. Analyses of videos of… Show more
“…One reason for this may be that changing behavior is a trailing indicator. This is consistent with studies that have found that changes in attitudes toward equity take time and repetition to be successfully incorporated into teachers' behavior (Aronson et al, 2020;Cochran-Smith et al, 2016;Kavanagh & Danielson, 2020). Changes in behaviors are also mediated by what educators see around them (Battey & Franke, 2015;Woodcock & Woolfson, 2019); participants who were still in the beginning stages of changing their practice may have found it difficult to do so in schools where equity approaches to teaching were not broadly adopted.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Teacher education, like many other fields, has long been criticized for examining equity issues at a surface level, if they are addressed at all (Aronson et al, 2020;Cochran-Smith, 1995) Moreover, even when equity is explicitly discussed in teacher education, it is often disconnected from practice (Sleeter, 2012). For example, Kavanagh & Danielson (2020) studied a teacher education program focused on preparing educators to teach in urban environments with a specific focus on equity and social justice. The researchers found that while the faculty in the program explicitly modeled instructional techniques and provided opportunities for student practice, they rarely did so for equity issues.…”
Section: Linking Equity and Practice In Teacher Educationmentioning
Diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) issues are urgent in education, given the widespread evidence of discriminatory behavior and widening racial disparities. Although DEI trainings can change participants’ attitudes they have minimal effects on behaviors. Simulations are a promising approach to address this gap between attitudinal and behavioral change. We developed an online course for educators (N = 963) that included a series of equity simulations and applied the structural topic model (STM), to identify alignment between participants' simulated behavior and equity attitudes on surveys. STM identified meaningful topics within participants’ simulation responses and that the prevalence of these topics varied by equity attitudes. We also measured changes in participants' behaviors over different, successive, simulations, by comparing with a reference group of high equity-oriented participants. Participants made significant shifts in the simulations toward equity-promoting behaviors (ES = 0.99), which corresponded with changes in equity-oriented attitudes (ES=0.74) and self-reported equity-promoting behaviors (ES=0.30).
“…One reason for this may be that changing behavior is a trailing indicator. This is consistent with studies that have found that changes in attitudes toward equity take time and repetition to be successfully incorporated into teachers' behavior (Aronson et al, 2020;Cochran-Smith et al, 2016;Kavanagh & Danielson, 2020). Changes in behaviors are also mediated by what educators see around them (Battey & Franke, 2015;Woodcock & Woolfson, 2019); participants who were still in the beginning stages of changing their practice may have found it difficult to do so in schools where equity approaches to teaching were not broadly adopted.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Teacher education, like many other fields, has long been criticized for examining equity issues at a surface level, if they are addressed at all (Aronson et al, 2020;Cochran-Smith, 1995) Moreover, even when equity is explicitly discussed in teacher education, it is often disconnected from practice (Sleeter, 2012). For example, Kavanagh & Danielson (2020) studied a teacher education program focused on preparing educators to teach in urban environments with a specific focus on equity and social justice. The researchers found that while the faculty in the program explicitly modeled instructional techniques and provided opportunities for student practice, they rarely did so for equity issues.…”
Section: Linking Equity and Practice In Teacher Educationmentioning
Diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) issues are urgent in education, given the widespread evidence of discriminatory behavior and widening racial disparities. Although DEI trainings can change participants’ attitudes they have minimal effects on behaviors. Simulations are a promising approach to address this gap between attitudinal and behavioral change. We developed an online course for educators (N = 963) that included a series of equity simulations and applied the structural topic model (STM), to identify alignment between participants' simulated behavior and equity attitudes on surveys. STM identified meaningful topics within participants’ simulation responses and that the prevalence of these topics varied by equity attitudes. We also measured changes in participants' behaviors over different, successive, simulations, by comparing with a reference group of high equity-oriented participants. Participants made significant shifts in the simulations toward equity-promoting behaviors (ES = 0.99), which corresponded with changes in equity-oriented attitudes (ES=0.74) and self-reported equity-promoting behaviors (ES=0.30).
“…Teacher educators have long struggled with how to create programming for teachers that bridges the gap between theory and practice and orients teacher education around the complexities and relational elements of teaching and learning to teach (Darling-Hammond, Hammerness, Grossman, Rust, & Shulman, 2005;Kavanagh & Danielson, 2020;Kazemi, Franke, & Lampert, 2009; McDonald, Kazemi, & Kavanagh, 2013;Zeichner, 2012).…”
Section: A Turn Toward Teacher Education-ambitious Teaching Core Practicesmentioning
Coach development programs have been moving away from knowledge focused, rationalistic pedagogies toward more constructivist, applied approaches that recognize the complex, relational, and contextual nature of coaching and learning to coach. Teacher educators have been doing similar pedagogical work: trying to identify the dynamic elements of what makes an expert teacher and distill those elements into a learner-centered teacher education framework that brings knowledge into action. One such practice-based teacher education framework is ambitious teaching core practices. Core practices are empirically-based moves and social routines that teachers learn to enact adaptively to enhance learning across diverse groups of students. The purpose of this study was to explore the application of ambitious teaching core practices to coach development and take a step toward identifying and defining coaching core practices. Findings from this Delphi panel of expert coaches resulted in 15 ambitious coaching core practices for facilitating athlete performance and well-being including allowing space for athlete exploration, creativity, and problem solving and developing and flexibly executing a practice plan. Applying the concept of core practices to coaching is both a novel way to understand effective coaching and a first step toward a new practice-based coach development framework.
“…Conklin and Hughes’s (2016) coding of their “compassionate, critical, justice-oriented” methods and curriculum courses, for example, found that their pedagogy incorporated representations more than decompositions and approximations. In another study, Kavanagh and Danielson (2019) analyzed video from their multicultural literacy methods course, finding that they employed pedagogies of enactment when teaching instructional practices but not when discussing issues of justice. Video analysis of novices’ instruction paralleled this, as most reflected on their instructional decisions through a frame of practice without attending to justice.…”
Section: Surfacing Divergence: Cpm’s Situated Critiques and Sjte’s Structural Critiquesmentioning
The Core Practices Movement (CPM) and Social Justice Teacher Education (SJTE) represent two communities of practice within which novices develop as professional educators. However, there is little dialogue about how they might collaborate to develop novice social justice educators, and the critiques and recommendations that do cross movements originate from divergent theoretical starting points. Possibilities for convergence within the learning theories that underpin CPM and SJTE are explored, examining how social learning theories might be infused with, and enveloped within, critical learning theories. This article thus re-presents teacher education as a “community of praxis.” Within each of its three hybrid dimensions—a shared repertoire of practice/praxis, mutual engagement of vertical and horizontal expertise, and joint enterprise of professional and political aims—possibilities for developing novice social justice educators are described, and tensions at the intersection of justice and practice in teacher education are explored.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.