2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajp.2011.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Practicing evidence-based psychiatry. 3. Interpreting treatment guidelines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the questions relevant to each section are addressed (Table 1), the actual report (comments to the authors and confidential comments to the editors) is developed and submitted to the Editor. It should be noted that the process of reviewing a manuscript has several parallels to elements of both submitting a manuscript for publication and reading a manuscript; these topics have been reviewed earlier in the Journal (Clark et al, 2011;Haj-Ibrahim and Tandon, 2011;Keshavan, 2011;Rankupalli and Tandon, 2010).…”
Section: Steps In Reviewing a Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the questions relevant to each section are addressed (Table 1), the actual report (comments to the authors and confidential comments to the editors) is developed and submitted to the Editor. It should be noted that the process of reviewing a manuscript has several parallels to elements of both submitting a manuscript for publication and reading a manuscript; these topics have been reviewed earlier in the Journal (Clark et al, 2011;Haj-Ibrahim and Tandon, 2011;Keshavan, 2011;Rankupalli and Tandon, 2010).…”
Section: Steps In Reviewing a Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%