Practices, programs and projects of urban carbon governance: Perspectives from the Australian city

Abstract

This paper addresses the governance of transitions to lower carbon cities. Drawing on both governmentality and neo-Gramscian perspectives, we chart and explore the diverse objects, subjects, means and ends evoked as governmental programs, or hegemonic projects in-the-making, are shaped to orchestrate urban carbon governance. We ask about the diversity of what is being sought through the governance of carbon in the city, how this is rendered and how carbon is being made to matter in the city. We do so through analysis of an audit of carbon governance initiatives in Australian cities, and a characterisation of these initiatives as four distinctive governmental programs. To make sense of the diverse ecology of initiatives revealed, we adopt a typological approach to suggest four distinctive governmental programs-Behaviour change; Demonstration; Transition; and Advocacy. We suggest that Australia's emergent landscape of urban carbon governance both reproduces existing governance orderings and contains openings-via fragile emergent hegemonic projects-that might produce more transformative orderings: not least because of the demands and politics the low carbon subjects being invoked might be empowered to pursue but also because of the potential reconfiguration of the 'integral state' as new governmental programs are imagined and enacted. Abstract: This paper addresses the governance of transitions to lower carbon cities. Drawing on both governmentality and neo-Gramscian perspectives, we chart and explore the diverse objects, subjects, means and ends evoked as governmental programs, or hegemonic projects in-the-making, are shaped to orchestrate urban carbon governance. We ask about the diversity of what is being sought through the governance of carbon in the city, how this is rendered and how carbon is being made to matter in the city. We do so through analysis of an audit of carbon governance initiatives in Australian cities, and a characterisation of these initiatives as four distinctive governmental programs. To make sense of the diverse ecology of initiatives revealed, we adopt a typological approach to suggest four distinctive governmental programs -Behaviour change; Demonstration; Transition; and Advocacy. We suggest that Australia's emergent landscape of urban carbon governance both reproduces existing governance orderings and contains openings -via fragile emergent hegemonic projects-that might produce more transformative orderings: not least because of the demands and politics the low carbon subjects being invoked might be empowered to pursue but also because of the potential reconfiguration of the 'integral state' as new governmental programs are imagined and enacted.

Organizing the Environmental Governance of the Rare-Earth Industry: China’s passive revolution

“…Levy & Spicer, 2013;McGuirk et al, 2014;Nyberg et al, 2013;Pearse, 2010;Rothenberg & Levy, 2012), sometimes emphasizing how environmental issues are pushed onto agendas by grassroots social movements and NGOs (MacKay & Munro, 2012). However, these empirical organizational studies of neo-Gramscian governance have been set mostly within the context of Western, Anglo-Saxon 'liberal market economies ' (Hall & Soskice, 2001), often ignoring state actors.…”

Low Carbon Urban Transitioning: From Local Experimentation to Urban Transformation?

“…Against this backdrop of upheaval and uncertainty at both federal and state levels around climate change policy, there has continued to be a growth in local government and community scale initiatives particularly focusing on energy efficiency, building retrofits, behaviour change programs and renewable energy projects [15,29]. We turn in the next section to focus on the types of initiatives emerging in Victoria and in particular on local government partnerships and alliances as key intermediaries working across levels of government and municipal boundaries, seeking to build capacities to achieve socio-technical change in their particular regions.…”

“…Low carbon initiatives across the world have been described as a "patchwork mosaic" [10] and questions remain around the extent to which local scale responses have the capacity to drive the types of systemic changes required. There is now a growing body of research analysing and comparing urban responses to climate change and whether the strategic intent of low carbon transitions and experiments can be realised in different urban contexts [4,[11][12][13][14][15]. This paper seeks to contribute to this research by examining the types of local carbon initiatives and experiments emerging in Melbourne, the role and capacity of local governments and extent to which strategic urban policy is helping or hindering the process of low carbon transitioning.…”

Seeing and Knowing the Earth as a System : An Effective History of Global Environmental Change Research as Scientific and Political Practice

“…When studying governmental programmes that seek to effect a change of conduct on a wider scale, the fourth dimension is very important, due to the fact that implementing ideas of 'the good subject' is one way of governing from a distance via the instilling of selfdiscipline in citizens. In the literature on governmentality, there are many examples of this; in order to make subjects become, for example, carbon-aware, they must be informed about and attentive to the effects of their lifestyle, as well as motivated to choose less harmful alternatives (Paterson and Stripple, 2010, Lövbrand and Stripple, 2013, McGuirk et al, 2014.…”